Runway Excursion Involving Cessna 172 at Navan Airfield

Casualties unknown • IE

A pilot experienced a loss of airspeed during takeoff in a Cessna 172, leading to a bounced landing and a runway excursion at Navan Airfield.

What happened

On 4 March 2022, a Cessna F172M, registration EI-DDC, was performing a general aviation flight from Navan Airfield, Co. Me/ath. After clearing frost from the wings, the pilot initiated a takeoff from Runway 27. Shortly after becoming airborne, the pilot noticed the airspeed was significantly lower than expected, indicating only 40 knots. To prevent a stall, the pilot attempted to land again, but the aircraft bounced upon touchdown. During the subsequent landing attempt, the aircraft veered right, struck a perimeter fence at the end of the runway, and came to rest in a nearby field. The pilot, the sole occupant, sustained no injuries, and the aircraft suffered minor damage.

The investigation

The AAIU examined the aircraft's performance, the pilot's experience, and the environmental conditions. The investigation noted that the pilot was more familiar with a different aircraft type and had very limited experience on the Cessna F172M. During pre-takeoff checks, the pilot observed that applying carburettor heat did not result in a noticeable change in engine RPM. Additionally, the investigation found that the pilot's takeoff technique involved placing both hands on the control yoke, leaving the throttle unguarded and without the use of the friction nut. Witnesses at the airfield also observed the aircraft flying at a high nose-up attitude and a reduced engine RPM.

Findings

Several factors contributed to the runway excursion:

  • The pilot's lack of familiarity with the specific aircraft type and its cockpit layout.
  • The likelihood that engine power decreased because the throttle crept backward due to vibration, as the throttle friction nut was not engaged and the pilot's hand was not on the lever.
  • Environmental conditions, including a low dew point depression, were highly conducive to carburettor icing, which may have degraded engine performance.
  • The aircraft became airborne at an insufficient airspeed; as it transitioned out of ground effect, increased induced drag prevented a stable climb.
  • The combination of a bounced landing and reduced braking effectiveness on the wet grass made it impossible to avoid the perimeter fence.

Probable cause

The accident was likely caused by a combination of insufficient airspeed at takeoff and a reduction in engine power due to the throttle creeping back, exacerbated by potential carburettor icing and the pilot's lack of familiarity with the aircraft's handling characteristics.

Frequently asked questions

What happened in the null Reims Aviation SA, Cessna F172M accident near IE?

A pilot experienced a loss of airspeed during takeoff in a Cessna 172, leading to a bounced landing and a runway excursion at Navan Airfield.

What aircraft was involved and where did it happen?

The accident on null involved a Reims Aviation SA, Cessna F172M, registration EI-DDC, at IE.

What was the probable cause of the accident?

The accident was likely caused by a combination of insufficient airspeed at takeoff and a reduction in engine power due to the throttle creeping back, exacerbated by potential carburettor icing and the pilot's lack of familiarity with the aircraft's handling characteristics.

Loading the flight search…