27 Nov 2023: CESSNA 170B

27 Nov 2023: CESSNA 170B (N170HT) — Unknown operator

No fatalities • Cameron Park, CA, United States

Probable cause

A failure of the right brake master cylinder piston due to a faulty return spring, which resulted in a seized right main landing gear brake and a runway excursion

— NTSB Determination

Accident narrative

On November 27, 2023, about 1305 Pacific standard time, a Cessna 170B, N170HT, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Cameron Park, California. The pilot and passenger were not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. According to the pilot, he completed four successful full-stop landings at a nearby airport before he returned to his home airport, Cameron Park Airport (O61). During his landing attempt at O61 the airplane touched down normally and immediately veered to the left. The pilot attempted to correct the movement by adding power and rudder input, but the airplane then veered to the right and departed the right side of the runway. He could not recall if he used brakes when he was trying to correct the movement. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the fuselage. A witness reported that he was about midfield and heard the airplane before it came into his field of view. As the airplane came into his field of view, he heard the engine power increase and then saw the main landing gear touch down with the tail wheel still in the air. The airplane then veered right, and the right main landing gear impacted a dirt berm before the airplane came to rest in an upright position. According to the pilot’s operating handbook (POH), the airplane was equipped with conventional toe-type brake pedals at the top of the rudder pedals. Two brake master cylinders were mounted directly to the pilot’s hydraulic brake pedals. The POH states that the brakes are actuated by applying toe pressure to the pilot’s rudder pedals. This movement actuates the master brake cylinders, which results in a braking action on the main landing gear wheels. According to the master brake cylinder section of the illustrated part’s catalogue, the cylinder is comprised of a piston rod and a piston return spring accompanied by securing hardware, O-rings, and sleeves. Examination of the brake system revealed no mechanical anomalies with the right and left main landing gear brake calipers. The left brake master cylinder functioned normally when tested while the right brake master cylinder was tested twice and failed to release pressure. The piston had to be manually raised before the cylinder would release pressure. Disassembly of the right brake master cylinder revealed that the piston return spring was deformed (bowed). According to the manufacturer, the failure of the cylinder to release pressure would have resulted in a locked brake. A review of the airplane maintenance records from 2002 to the date of the accident showed that the airplane was involved in an incident that required a repair of the pilot-side right brake master cylinder attachment area by installing a doubler on June 20, 2015. The endorsement also showed that the shafts of both brake master cylinders were replaced along with O-rings. The pilot-side left brake master cylinder was subsequently replaced on July 13, 2016. There was no maintenance requirement for the return spring to be inspected or replaced, nor was there any indication in the maintenance records that the return spring had ever been replaced. Federal Aviation Regulations Part 43 Appendix D lists “brakes – for improper adjustment” as required inspection items for annual and 100-hour inspections. The pilot stated that the brakes felt normal when he tested them before the accident flight. He also noted that he felt resistance on the brakes and that neither were mushy when he activated them upon touchdown and lost directional control of the airplane. He had also completed a full-stop landing at the nearby airport he flew to before to the accident and did not observe any issues with the brakes when he applied them.

Contributing factors

  • Master cylinder/brake valve — Failure
  • Brake — Failure

Conditions

Weather
VMC, wind 320/05kt, vis 10sm

Loading the flight search…

What you can do on Flight Finder

  • Search flights between any two airports with live fares.
  • By aircraft — pick a plane model (e.g. Boeing 787, Airbus A350) and see every route it flies from your origin.
  • Route map — click any airport worldwide to explore its destinations, or draw a radius to find nearby airports.
  • Global aviation safety — aviation accident database, 5,200+ records since 1980, with map and rankings by aircraft and operator.
  • NTSB safety feed — recent U.S. aviation accidents and incidents from the official NTSB CAROL database, updated daily.

Frequently asked questions

How do I search flights by aircraft type on FlightFinder?

Pick an aircraft model — Boeing 737, Airbus A320, A380, Boeing 787 Dreamliner and more — enter your origin airport, and FlightFinder shows every route that plane flies from there with live fares.

Which aircraft types can I filter by?

We support Boeing 737/747/757/767/777/787, the full Airbus A220/A319/A320/A321/A330/A340/A350/A380 family, Embraer E170/E175/E190/E195, Bombardier CRJ and Dash 8, and the ATR 42/72 turboprops.

Is FlightFinder free to use?

Search and schedules are free. Pro ($4.99/month, $39/year, or $99 one-time lifetime) unlocks the enriched flight card — on-time stats, CO₂ per passenger, amenities, live gate & weather — plus My Trips with push alerts.

Where does the route data come from?

Live schedules come from Amadeus, AeroDataBox and Travelpayouts. Observed routes (which aircraft actually flew a given city pair) are crowdsourced from adsb.lol ADS-B data under the Open Database License.