Performance degradation leads to tree strike in Cessna 180H floatplane accident

Casualties unknown • CA

A Cessna 180H floatplane failed to clear trees during takeoff at Cordingley Lake, Ontario, after an unrecorded reduction in climb performance caused by a propeller configuration mismatch.

What happened

On a local flight from Cordingley Lake, Ontario, a Cessna 180H floatplane, registration N720CS, failed to climb sufficiently during takeoff, leading to a collision with trees. The aircraft, carrying the pilot and two passengers, began its takeoff run without backtracking. After reaching tree-top height, the aircraft ceased to accelerate or climb, with airspeed dropping to approximately 60 mph.

As the aircraft approached the shoreline, the pilot attempted to maneuver toward lower terrain and deployed full flaps while maintaining full power, hoping to cushion the impact. The aircraft struck the treetops and subsequently pitched nose-down into the ground. The three occupants sustained minor injuries, and a small fuel-fed fire occurred following the impact.

The investigation

The investigation focused on the aircraft's performance capabilities and the pilot's takeoff technique. Investigators examined the interaction between the installed Canadian Aircraft Products (CAP) series 3000D floats and the 78-inch, three-blade Hartzell propeller.

It was established that while the three-blade propeller was approved under a supplemental type certificate (STC), the performance analysis used for that approval compared the 78-inch propeller to 82-inch propellers used on landplanes, rather than the 88-inch propeller typically used for floatplane configurations. Consequently, the aircraft could not meet the performance specifications listed in the Cessna owner's manual supplement. Furthermore, the pilot was unaware of a specific takeoff procedure—involving early flap retraction—that the aircraft owner had developed to compensate for this performance loss.

Probable cause

The primary cause was the failure of the FAA to recognize that the three-blade propeller STC would result in a performance penalty for the floatplane configuration, leading to an inability to clear obstacles. Contributing factors included the pilot's lack of familiarity with the owner's compensatory takeoff technique, the pilot's decision not to use the full length of the lake, and the owner's inability to monitor the takeoff from the rear seat.

Frequently asked questions

What happened in the 2006-07-19 Cordingley Lake, Ontario accident near CA?

A Cessna 180H floatplane failed to clear trees during takeoff at Cordingley Lake, Ontario, after an unrecorded reduction in climb performance caused by a propeller configuration mismatch.

What aircraft was involved and where did it happen?

The accident on 2006-07-19 involved a Cordingley Lake, Ontario, operated by Cessna 180H N720CS, at CA.

What was the probable cause of the accident?

The primary cause was the failure of the FAA to recognize that the three-blade propeller STC would result in a performance penalty for the floatplane configuration, leading to an inability to clear obstacles. Contributing factors included the pilot's lack of familiarity with the owner's compensatory takeoff…

Loading the flight search…