No fatalities

Hydraulic System Failure Prompts Diversion of Canadian Airlines Flight 431

Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA

On August 19, 1994, a Boeing 737-242C C-GNDC operated by Canadian Airlines International Ltd. was involved in an aviation accident near Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA. No fatalities were reported. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The aluminium alloy end cap failed because of low cycle fatigue under normal service loads. This summary draws on records from the Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB).

Sourcesthe Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB)Primary reportUpdated 2026-10-18Data APIEditorial standards
Boeing 737-242C C-GNDC
Photo: San Diego Air & Space Museum Archives / Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Canadian Airlines flight 431 lost A-system hydraulic pressure on approach to The Pas, conducted a missed approach, and diverted to Winnipeg. The aircraft landed safely without injuries. Investigation revealed an aluminium end cap failure due to low-cycle fatigue.

Incident Overview

Canadian Airlines flight 431 was on approach to land at The Pas, Manitoba, when the aircraft's A-system hydraulic pressure dropped to zero. The crew executed a missed approach and, after consulting with company maintenance control, decided to return to land at Winnipeg. The crew declared an emergency and requested priority handling. Winnipeg airport emergency response services were placed on standby. The aircraft landed safely. The runway was closed until the aircraft could be towed to the terminal and spilled hydraulic fluid was washed from the surface. There were no injuries.

Investigation Findings

Company maintenance personnel determined that the A-system hydraulic fluid depleted when the end cap failed on a hydraulic transfer cylinder installed in the left main landing gear wheel well. The failed transfer cylinder (Boeing Assembly No. 69-54600-2, Serial No. 585) was removed from the aircraft. The failed components of the end cap and the internal shuttle mechanism were removed from the cylinder. Both end caps installed on this hydraulic transfer cylinder were made of an aluminium alloy material. The failed end cap displayed evidence of a multi-surfaced fracture that emanated from an internal groove and proceeded around the circumference of the cap material. The failed components were forwarded to the TSB Engineering Laboratory Branch for analysis.

Maintenance History

The hydraulic transfer cylinder end caps are the subject of Boeing Service Bulletin (S.B. 737-32-1099), issued 14 September 1979, which recommended replacement of aluminium end caps with higher strength stainless steel end caps. On 10 January 1985, Canadian Airlines International created an engineering order (E.O. 3200-01033) that referenced the service bulletin and mandated replacement of the aluminium hydraulic transfer cylinder end caps at the next cylinder shop visit. The engineering order did not specify action to be taken regarding aluminium end caps installed on cylinder assemblies that were in inventory ready for installation on company aircraft. Following installation, the hydraulic transfer cylinders are maintained as "on-condition" units and are not required to be removed or overhauled in accordance with any specified time-frame.

The data plate on the failed unit indicated that the transfer cylinder was a ...-2 model. Company records indicated that the hydraulic transfer cylinder was a ...-1 model. The data plate serial number (585) was consistently displayed in all records for the component. This hydraulic transfer cylinder was installed from inventory stock on the occurrence aircraft on 30 July 1985. The cap failed approximately nine years and one month after installation, after 44,149.22 hours in service.

Cause Determination

The material composition of the failed end cap was consistent with the standard aluminium alloy (AA 7075 heat treated to a T-73 condition) used in the original end cap construction. The mode of failure was determined to be low-cycle fatigue; the fracture propagated under normal service loads from fatigue-generated pre-cracks originating at the top edge of a ring groove in the internal diameter of the end cap. No stress concentrations other than those caused by the geometry of the groove were detected.

The Transportation Safety Board concluded that the aluminium alloy end cap failed because of low cycle fatigue under normal service loads.

Probable cause

The aluminium alloy end cap failed because of low cycle fatigue under normal service loads.

All Boeing 737-800 accidents →

Frequently asked questions

What happened in the 19 Aug 1994 Boeing 737-242C C-GNDC accident near Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA?

Canadian Airlines flight 431 lost A-system hydraulic pressure on approach to The Pas, conducted a missed approach, and diverted to Winnipeg. The aircraft landed safely without injuries. Investigation revealed an aluminium end cap failure due to low-cycle fatigue.

Were there any fatalities in the 19 Aug 1994 Boeing 737-242C C-GNDC accident?

No fatalities were recorded in this accident.

What aircraft was involved and where did it happen?

The accident on 19 Aug 1994 involved a Boeing 737-242C C-GNDC, operated by Canadian Airlines International Ltd., at Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA.

What was the probable cause of the accident?

The aluminium alloy end cap failed because of low cycle fatigue under normal service loads.