What happened
During an operation at a 430-meter two-way airstrip, a pilot attempted to land an aircraft following two unsuccessful approach attempts. The initial two approaches, both directed toward the northwest, were aborted via go-arounds at altitudes of 200 feet and 100 feet as the pilot sought to evaluate surface wind conditions and determine the optimal landing direction.
On the third attempt, as the aircraft descended to approximately 20 to 30 feet above the ground, the pilot observed that the groundspeed was not decreasing as expected. Realizing that a go-around was no longer a viable option, the pilot continued the landing attempt. Despite applying maximum braking, the aircraft veered 90 degrees to the left, resulting in substantial damage to the wing, fuselage, and undercarriage.
The investigation
Investigators reviewed the sequence of the pilot's approaches and the environmental conditions present at the airstrip. The inquiry focused on the pilot's assessment of the wind and the aircraft's performance during the final touchdown. Eyewitness accounts provided critical context regarding the wind direction and velocity during the incident.
Findings
- The pilot performed two prior go-arounds to assess the wind.
- The pilot misjudged the strength of a tailwind, which was estimated to be nearly 10 knots.
- The high groundspeed prevented the aircraft from slowing sufficiently during the landing roll.
- The aircraft deviated significantly from the runway centerline, causing structural damage.