Engine Fire and EGPWS Warnings on ATR-72 During Return to Taipei

Casualties unknown • 4KM East from RCSS/in the air, TW

An ATR-72 experienced a left engine fire during climb-out from Taipei Songshan Airport, leading to a complex return approach involving multiple stall warnings and terrain alerts.

What happened

On May 2, 2012, an ATR-72-212A, registration B-22810, operated by China Airlines (TransAsia Airways) as flight GE515, departed Taipei Songshan Airport for Magong, Penghu. The aircraft was carrying 72 passengers and 4 crew members. During the climb, the flight crew received a primary warning, followed by an "ENG 1 FIRE" alert. The crew responded by moving the left engine throttle to flight idle and requested radar vectors for a return to Songshan Airport.

While executing the return, the crew performed engine fire extinguishing procedures, discharging two fire bottles into the left engine. During the descent and approach, the aircraft's Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning System (EGPWS) activated multiple times. The aircraft struggled to intercept the ILS localizer for Runway 10, and the crew's attempt to maneuver for terrain avoidance at low altitudes resulted in several stall warnings. Despite the turbulence and technical challenges, the aircraft landed safely at Songshan Airport with no injuries.

The investigation

The investigation focused on the mechanical failure of the engine and the subsequent flight maneuvers. Investigators examined the left engine's turbine section and analyzed the flight data recorder (FDR) and cockpit voice recorder (CVR) to reconstruct the sequence of EGPWS and stall warnings. The investigation also reviewed the crew's management of the emergency and the air traffic control (ATC) communications during the approach.

Findings

  • The primary cause of the engine fire was a material shrinkage defect in the casting of a first-stage power turbine rotor blade. This defect led to a fatigue crack, causing the blade to fracture and break away.
  • The broken blade struck other components within the turbine stage, damaging the shroud and low-pressure turbine casing.
  • The resulting imbalance caused vibrations that ruptured the number 6 and 7 bearing oil lines, spraying hot oil onto the engine exhaust, which ignited the fire.
  • The crew's flight management during the emergency was noted as a contributing factor; specifically, the crew did not declare an emergency or explicitly notify ATC of the engine fire, which hindered the controller's ability to plan effectively.
  • The crew's execution of EGPWS Mode 2 recovery procedures—involving high pitch angles at low speeds—led to multiple stall warnings.
  • The aircraft encountered moderate to severe turbulence and localized wind shear during the approach.

Probable cause

A manufacturing defect (shrinkage hole) in a first-stage power turbine blade caused the blade to fracture, leading to internal engine damage and a subsequent oil fire. This was compounded by flight management challenges, including improper emergency declaration and maneuvers that triggered stall warnings.

Frequently asked questions

What happened in the 2012-05-02 Avions De Transport Regional/ATR72-212A accident near 4KM East from RCSS/in the air, TW?

An ATR-72 experienced a left engine fire during climb-out from Taipei Songshan Airport, leading to a complex return approach involving multiple stall warnings and terrain alerts.

What aircraft was involved and where did it happen?

The accident on 2012-05-02 involved a Avions De Transport Regional/ATR72-212A, registration B-22810, at 4KM East from RCSS/in the air, TW.

What was the probable cause of the accident?

A manufacturing defect (shrinkage hole) in a first-stage power turbine blade caused the blade to fracture, leading to internal engine damage and a subsequent oil fire. This was compounded by flight management challenges, including improper emergency declaration and maneuvers that triggered stall warnings.

Loading the flight search…