In-flight pitch upset involving Bombardier Challenger 300 near Moscow

Casualties unknown • FI

A business jet experienced a sudden pitch upset during climb near Moscow, resulting in two passenger injuries and cabin damage.

What happened

On 23 December 2010, at 16:10 UTC, a Bombardier BD–100–1A10 Challenger 300, registration OH-FLM, experienced a sudden in-flight pitch upset while climbing near the Moscow Terminal Control Area. The aircraft was operating a flight from Moscow to St. Petersburg. The flight was a familiarization flight for the co-pilot, who was designated as the pilot flying for the duration of the mission.

During the initial climb, the Engine Indication and Crew Alerting System (EICAS) issued an autopilot stabilizer trim failure warning. Following the established fault checklists, the captain disengaged the autopilot. This action triggered a series of pitch oscillations, specifically a nose-up and nose-down motion, which the crew eventually stabilized. The aircraft subsequently returned to Sheremetyevo Airport. The incident resulted in two injuries to passengers and damage to the cabin interior. The injured passengers were transported to a hospital in Moscow.

The investigation

The investigation focused on the sequence of events following the autopilot disengagement and the adequacy of the aircraft's checklists. Investigators examined the crew's handling of the failure and the technical characteristics of the aircraft's flight control systems. The inquiry also reviewed the crew's training, cockpit coordination, and the specific instructions contained within the aircraft's checklists regarding manual flight transitions.

Findings

The primary cause of the upset was the overcontrolling of the aircraft's pitch attitude immediately after the autopilot was disengaged.

Several contributing factors were identified:

  • The flight crew lacked sufficient knowledge regarding the operating principles and characteristics of the aircraft's artificial pitch feel system, as well as deficiencies in their specific system training.
  • There were notable shortcomings in the crew's pre-flight checks and cockpit coordination during the flight.
  • The aircraft's checklists instructed the pilots to grip the control column firmly before disengaging the autopilot, but failed to instruct them to adjust the airspeed to match the horizontal stabilizer's position.
  • The checklists did not include a requirement to activate the 'Fasten Seat Belt' sign prior to the event.
  • The high airspeed at the time of the occurrence contributed to the significant G-forces experienced during the pitch oscillations.

Probable cause

The aircraft's pitch attitude was overcontrolled immediately following the disengagement of the autopilot. This was exacerbated by the crew's lack of familiarity with the artificial pitch feel system and inadequate training on its operating principles.

Frequently asked questions

What happened in the 2010-12-23 aircraft accident near FI?

A business jet experienced a sudden pitch upset during climb near Moscow, resulting in two passenger injuries and cabin damage.

What aircraft was involved and where did it happen?

The accident on 2010-12-23 involved a aircraft, registration OH-FLM, at FI.

What was the probable cause of the accident?

The aircraft's pitch attitude was overcontrolled immediately following the disengagement of the autopilot. This was exacerbated by the crew's lack of familiarity with the artificial pitch feel system and inadequate training on its operating principles.

Loading the flight search…