ANSV Investigation Summary: Multiple Aviation Incidents (2001–2004)

Casualties unknown • IT

A review of several ANSV safety investigations involving various aircraft types, highlighting incidents ranging from engine power loss to TCAS resolution advisories.

What happened

Between 2001 and 2004, several aviation incidents were investigated by the ANSV. On May 22, 2001, a Hughes H269C, registration I-GRAL, performing aerial spraying, experienced a perceived loss of engine power. The pilot attempted an emergency landing on sloped terrain, which caused the helicopter to overturn due to the uneven ground.

In June 2001, a Grob G103A glider, registration D-2891, was unable to reach its intended airfield due to insufficient altitude. The pilot attempted an off-field landing, but an undetected depression in the landing area caused the glider to fail to decelerate, eventually striking a hedge. Shortly after, a Cessna 305C, registration I-EIAG, experienced a rightward yaw during landing at Calcinate del Pesce, resulting in the wingtip striking the ground.

In 2002, a Diamond DA 20-C1, registration N970CT, diverted to Salerno Pontecagnano after the pilot noted fuel levels approaching zero. In April 2002, a significant separation event occurred near Milan Malpensa involving a Boeing MD-80 (I-DACR) and a Bombardier CRJ-100 (D-ACLJ). Both aircraft triggered TCAS Resolution Advisories (RA) after their separation fell below the required minimums during approach.

Other notable incidents included a Cessna 172N (I-SAAB) that flipped during a water landing at Lake Como, and an Alexander Schleicher ASK 21 (I-LVIG) that lost control during landing at Aosta due to excessive speed. In June 2004, a Reims/Cessna F172H (I-PONC) veered off the runway at Cremona after a passenger inadvertently applied the right brake pedal. Finally, a Schempp-Hirth Ventus 2c (D-2536) became stuck in trees near the Avisio River following an aerodynamic stall.

The investigation

The ANSV examined various factors including engine performance, flight planning, and pilot maneuvers. For the I-GRAL incident, the engine was disassembled and found to be free of anomalies. In the case of the I-DACR and D-ACLJ separation, investigators analyzed radar data and ATC communications, confirming that the controller's changes to the arrival sequence led to the loss of separation.

Findings

  • The primary cause of the I-GRAL accident was the selection of an unsuitable landing area.
  • The N970CT fuel emergency was attributed to inadequate flight planning regarding fuel consumption.
  • The D-ACLJ and I-DACR separation event was caused by the ATC controller's inability to optimally manage changes made to the approach sequence.
  • The D-2536 glider stall was triggered by an inadequate assessment of available landing areas along the flight path.

Probable cause

The investigated incidents were largely driven by pilot error in landing site selection, inadequate flight planning, and air traffic control sequencing errors.

Frequently asked questions

What happened in the 2001-05-22 aircraft accident near IT?

A review of several ANSV safety investigations involving various aircraft types, highlighting incidents ranging from engine power loss to TCAS resolution advisories.

What aircraft was involved and where did it happen?

The accident on 2001-05-22 involved a aircraft, registration I-GRAL, at IT.

What was the probable cause of the accident?

The investigated incidents were largely driven by pilot error in landing site selection, inadequate flight planning, and air traffic control sequencing errors.

Loading the flight search…