Flight Control Anomalies During Go-Around Lead to Split Elevator Control

Casualties unknown • Incident with an aircraft of the type BAe ATP, SE

A BAe ATP crew experienced unexpected pitch-up tendencies and split elevator control during a night cargo approach to Guernsey, prompting a diversion to Jersey.

What happened

On 26 January 2016, a BAe ATP, registration G-BUUR, was conducting a night cargo flight from Jersey to Guernsey. During the approach to Runway 27, the crew encountered strong crosswinds and gusty conditions. As the aircraft approached decision altitude, the pilot flying attempted to disengage the autopilot, but the crew did not hear the expected audio alert. Believing the autopilot remained engaged and sensing stiff controls, the crew initiated a go-around.

During the climb, the aircraft exhibited a significant pitch-up tendency. The pilot flying applied substantial forward pressure on the control column to counteract the nose-up movement, while the pilot not flying instinctively assisted with manual pressure. This period of intense control input coincided with the activation of the Standby Control System (SCS), resulting in the left and right elevators operating in split control. Distracted by these flight control issues, the crew failed to follow standard operating procedures, leading to the delayed retraction of flaps and landing gear. The crew eventually leveled the aircraft, re-engaged the autopilot, and diverted to Jersey for landing.

The investigation

The investigation focused on the cause of the autopilot disengagement failure and the subsequent elevator split. Investigators analyzed flight data from the FDR and QAR, which showed that the autopilot did disengage as commanded, despite the crew's perception. However, the investigation was hampered by the fact that the Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) had been overwritten during maintenance before the AAIB was notified.

Technical examinations of the aircraft revealed no mechanical defects that would explain the reported autopilot failure. Investigators also looked into human factors, including the crew's lack of a detailed go-around briefing and the potential impact of fatigue, as the crew's rest period had fallen short of the operator's requirements due to hotel-related issues.

Probable cause

The primary cause of the split elevator control was likely the crew's intense, opposing manual inputs on the control column during the go-around, which may have triggered the Standby Control System. This was compounded by the crew's failure to follow standard procedures and use effective decision-making models during a high-workload, stressful event.

Frequently asked questions

What happened in the 2016-01-26 aircraft accident near Incident with an aircraft of the type BAe ATP, SE?

A BAe ATP crew experienced unexpected pitch-up tendencies and split elevator control during a night cargo approach to Guernsey, prompting a diversion to Jersey.

What aircraft was involved and where did it happen?

The accident on 2016-01-26 involved a aircraft, at Incident with an aircraft of the type BAe ATP, SE.

What was the probable cause of the accident?

The primary cause of the split elevator control was likely the crew's intense, opposing manual inputs on the control column during the go-around, which may have triggered the Standby Control System. This was compounded by the crew's failure to follow standard procedures and use effective decision-making models during…

Loading the flight search…