No fatalities

Cessna 172 departs runway after go-around and unstable approach at Lanseria (ZS-IUD)

Next to Runway 24 L at Lanseria International Aerodrome, ZA

On December 10, 2006, a Cessna 172 (registration ZS-IUD) was involved in an aviation accident near Next to Runway 24 L at Lanseria International Aerodrome, ZA. No fatalities were reported. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The pilot placed himself under pressure by approaching for Runway 24R then accepting Runway 24L and executed an unstable approach for a runway he was not cleared to land on initially. This summary draws on records from the South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA) Accident and Incident Investigations Division; 1 related events involving the same aircraft type or operator are linked below.

Sourcesthe South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA) Accident and Incident Investigations DivisionPrimary reportUpdated 2026-10-18Data APIEditorial standards

A Cessna 172, ZS-IUD, veered off Runway 24L at Lanseria Airport after an unstable approach. No injuries occurred; propeller damage only. The pilot accepted a last-minute runway change.

Synopsis

On 10 December 2006, a Cessna 172 (registration ZS-IUD) operated as a private flight with one pilot and three passengers departed and was scheduled to return to Lanseria International Aerodrome (FALA). After approximately two hours of flight, the pilot was approaching for landing. Air Traffic Control (ATC) vectored the aircraft to join a left downwind for Runway 06L. While on left base, ATC advised the pilot to perform a go-around and reposition for Runway 24, which had become the active runway due to a change in wind direction.

During the go-around, ATC offered the pilot a choice between Runway 24L and Runway 24R. The pilot initially selected Runway 24R but overshot it slightly. ATC then offered Runway 24L, which the pilot accepted. The tower issued a landing clearance and advised that the surface wind was 310° at 10 knots.

Incident Details

After touchdown approximately 500 meters past the threshold of Runway 24L, the aircraft began to veer to the left and departed the runway. The pilot attempted to maintain directional control but was unsuccessful, and the aircraft entered a shallow ditch adjacent to the runway. None of the four occupants were injured, and the aircraft sustained damage only to the propeller.

Meteorological and Maintenance Information

At the time of the incident, surface wind was 310° at 10 knots, temperature 27°C, and visibility was CAVOK. The last Mandatory Periodic Inspection (MPI) was certified on 1 December 2006 at 5,306 airframe hours; the aircraft had accumulated an additional 4 hours since then. The aircraft was first registered in South Africa on 2 August 1972, and all applicable Airworthiness Directives and Service Bulletins were complied with according to documentation.

Probable Cause

The pilot placed himself under pressure by approaching for Runway 24R then accepting Runway 24L and executed an unstable approach for a runway he was not cleared to land on initially. The unstable approach increased the pilot’s workload, resulting in the loss of directional control during landing, which was aggravated by a crosswind condition.

All Cessna 172 accidents →

Frequently asked questions

What happened in the 10 Dec 2006 Cessna 172 accident near Next to Runway 24 L at Lanseria International Aerodrome, ZA?

A Cessna 172, ZS-IUD, veered off Runway 24L at Lanseria Airport after an unstable approach. No injuries occurred; propeller damage only. The pilot accepted a last-minute runway change.

Were there any fatalities in the 10 Dec 2006 Cessna 172 accident?

No fatalities were recorded in this accident.

What aircraft was involved and where did it happen?

The accident on 10 Dec 2006 involved a Cessna 172, registration ZS-IUD, at Next to Runway 24 L at Lanseria International Aerodrome, ZA.

What was the probable cause of the accident?

The pilot placed himself under pressure by approaching for Runway 24R then accepting Runway 24L and executed an unstable approach for a runway he was not cleared to land on initially. The unstable approach increased the pilot’s workload resulting in the loss of directional control during landing, which was aggravated…