Casualties unknown

Engine and Pylon Separation After Failure of Fatigue-Cracked Support Fitting (HK360)

Miami, FL, US

On April 25, 1992, a Boeing 707-324C (registration HK360) operated by Trans Aereos Mercan Pan AM was involved in an aviation accident near Miami, FL. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: Failure of the pylon inboard midspar support fitting due to fatigue cracking that was not visible during inspection. This summary draws on records from the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive.

Sourcesthe U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archivePrimary reportUpdated 2026-06-10Data APIEditorial standards
Boeing 707-324C
Photo: USAF / Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Shortly after takeoff, the #3 engine and pylon separated due to failure of the pylon inboard midspar support fitting, which had cracked from fatigue and was not visible during inspections.

Incident Overview

Shortly after takeoff, the #3 engine and its supporting pylon detached from the aircraft. The separation occurred as a result of the failure of the pylon inboard midspar support fitting. Investigation revealed that the fitting had been cracked for some time due to fatigue, and the crack had propagated to the point of structural failure.

Inspection Background

The failed fitting was subject to Federal Aviation Administration Airworthiness Directive 88-24-10 and Boeing Service Bulletin 3183. These directives required a visual inspection of the midspar fitting every 1,500 flight hours or 600 flight cycles, whichever occurred first. The inspection was designed to detect cracks in the fitting.

Inspection History

Records show that the inspection had been performed on the failed fitting on January 2, 1992. At the time of the failure, 821 flight hours and 328 flight cycles had elapsed since that inspection. Despite being completed on schedule, the crack was not detected, likely because the point of cracking was not visible for inspection from the wing.

Conclusion

The separation was caused by the failure of the pylon inboard midspar support fitting, which had developed a fatigue crack that was not detectable through the required visual inspections.

Probable cause

Failure of the pylon inboard midspar support fitting due to fatigue cracking that was not visible during inspection.

Investigation report by the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive. Original record: https://carol.ntsb.gov/event/20001211X14475. This page is a structured re-presentation; facts and quotes are in the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), United States.