Casualties unknown

1995-02-17: Douglas DC-8-63 (N782AL) — Air Transport International Limited Liability CO — Kansas City, MO

Kansas City, MO, US

On February 17, 1995, a Douglas DC-8-63 (registration N782AL) operated by Air Transport International Limited Liability CO was involved in an aviation accident near Kansas City, MO. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: (1) THE LOSS OF DIRECTIONAL CONTROL BY THE PILOT IN COMMAND DURING THE TAKEOFF ROLL, AND HIS DECISION TO CONTINUE THE TAKEOFF AND INITIATE A ROTATION BELOW THE COMPUTED ROTATION AIRSPEED, RESULTING IN A PREMATURE LIFTOFF, FURTHER LOSS OF CONTROL AND COLLISION… This summary draws on records from the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive.

Sourcesthe U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archivePrimary reportUpdated 1781061362Data APIEditorial standards
Aircraft registered N782AL
Aircraft registered N782AL. Photo: Ryan Hales / CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

The airplane crashed immediately after lift-off during a three-engine takeoff. The flightcrew had shortened a rest break, and rest periods were not required for ferry flights. Fatigue, inadequate training, and procedural deviations were noted.

Accident Overview

The airplane crashed immediately after lift-off during a three-engine takeoff. The takeoff was part of a ferry flight.

Flightcrew Rest and Fatigue

The flightcrew had shortened their rest break prior to the flight. Rest periods were not required for ferry flights operating under FAR Part 91. The flightcrew was fatigued from lack of rest, sleep, and disruption of circadian rhythms.

Training and Procedures

The flightcrew did not have adequate, realistic training in three-engine takeoff techniques or procedures. They did not adequately understand three-engine takeoff procedures, including the significance of VMCG (minimum control speed on ground). The flight engineer improperly determined the VMCG speed, resulting in a value that was 9 knots too low.

First Takeoff Attempt

During the first takeoff attempt, the captain applied power to the asymmetrical engine too soon, was unable to maintain directional control, and rejected the takeoff. The captain then agreed to modify the prescribed procedure by allowing the flight engineer to advance the throttle, a deviation from standard procedure.

FAA Oversight

FAA oversight of the operator was inadequate. The Principal Operations Inspector (POI) and geographic inspectors were unable to effectively monitor domestic crew training and international operations. The existing FAR Part 121 flight time limits and rest requirements that pertained to the flights flown by the flightcrew prior to the ferry flight did not apply to the ferry flight, which was conducted under FAR Part 91.

One-Engine Inoperative Takeoff Procedures

Current one-engine inoperative takeoff procedures do not provide adequate rudder availability for correcting directional deviations during the takeoff roll compatible with the achievement of maximum asymmetric thrust at an appropriate speed greater than ground minimum control speed.

Investigation report by the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive. Original record: https://carol.ntsb.gov/event/20001207X02949. This page is a structured re-presentation; facts and quotes are in the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), United States.