Casualties unknown

1999-04-30: Schweizer 269C-1 (N6148V) — Concord, CA

Concord, CA, US

On April 30, 1999, a Schweizer 269C-1 (registration N6148V) was involved in an aviation accident near Concord, CA. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The inadequate supervision of the student pilot by the flight instructor during the practice autorotation, which resulted in a delayed flare and the tail rotor contacting the ground. This summary draws on records from the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive.

Sourcesthe U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archivePrimary reportUpdated 1781061362Data APIEditorial standards

During autorotation practice, a helicopter's tail rotor struck the runway after the student flared too high; the instructor's intent was misunderstood, leading to a loss of control.

Incident Overview

A helicopter was conducting straight-in autorotations with power recoveries during a training flight. The flight instructor and student were practicing the maneuver, with the student acting as the primary manipulator of the controls for the first four approaches. The student had been initiating the flare too high, prompting the instructor to suggest performing the next approach together with both individuals on the controls.

Sequence of Events

During the flare portion of the subsequent autorotation, the helicopter's stinger struck the runway surface. Following this, the tail rotor contacted the ground, causing the helicopter to yaw 360 degrees to the right. The aircraft came to rest approximately 100 feet from the initial point of impact, at which point the tail rotor again struck the runway. The impact of the main rotor severed the tail boom.

Instructor's Account

The instructor reported his belief that the student had misinterpreted the instructions. The instructor had intended for the student to make control inputs to initiate the flare, with the instructor merely following through on the controls to guide the student to flare at a lower altitude than on previous attempts. However, the student understood the instruction to mean that the instructor would be making the primary control inputs. The instructor stated that the accident could have been prevented through better communication between student and instructor, specifically regarding who is responsible for initiating control inputs during all phases of flight, especially critical phases.

Investigation report by the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive. Original record: https://carol.ntsb.gov/event/20001205X00510. This page is a structured re-presentation; facts and quotes are in the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), United States.