Casualties unknown

Ground Contact During Pushback Damages Aircraft Fuselage (N302FE)

Newark, NJ, US

On March 1, 2000, a Mcdonnell Douglas DC-10-30F (registration N302FE) was involved in an aviation accident near Newark, NJ. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The tug operator's inadequate visual lookout. This summary draws on records from the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive.

Sourcesthe U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archivePrimary reportUpdated 2026-06-10Data APIEditorial standards
Aircraft registered N302FE
Aircraft registered N302FE. Photo: Tomás Del Coro from Las Vegas, Nevada, USA / CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

An aircraft struck a loading dock during pushback, suffering an 8-foot gash, after the tug driver reported a sticking drive mechanism. Post-accident testing revealed no anomalies, but component replacement resolved intermittent issues.

Incident Overview

During taxi preparations for departure, the APU door light illuminated on the flight deck. The aircraft returned to the loading dock, where the engines were shut down. Maintenance personnel closed and secured the APU door. Subsequently, the engines were restarted, and the aircraft began a second pushback.

Pushback Configuration

Two maintenance technicians were involved in the pushback operation. One technician was positioned off the right side of the aircraft, wearing a headset. The other technician operated the tug. After receiving clearance to push, the tug driver initiated a gradual turn to avoid nearby equipment and to minimize jet blast exposure to other gates.

Collision with Loading Dock

Approximately halfway down the ramp, the left side of the aircraft contacted the loading dock. The impact produced an 8-foot-long gash on the left fuselage, below the cockpit area.

Tug Malfunction Reports

The tug operator reported that the tug's drive mechanism was intermittently sticking in a '2-wheel' or 'crab' mode. A post-accident investigation of the tug revealed no mechanical discrepancies. However, other technicians subsequently reported experiencing the same intermittent problem with the tug. Components were removed for testing, and no anomalies were found. After those components were replaced, no further issues with the tug were reported.

Manufacturer's Statement

A representative from the tug's manufacturer stated that, regardless of the system status, the operator would always have had front wheel steering and braking capability.

Investigation Findings

No official probable cause was determined from the available information.

Investigation report by the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive. Original record: https://carol.ntsb.gov/event/20001212X20714. This page is a structured re-presentation; facts and quotes are in the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), United States.