Casualties unknown

2001-01-11: DE Havilland DHC-6-300 (N824ED) — Earth Data Aviation — Fort Worth, TX

Fort Worth, TX, US

On January 11, 2001, a DE Havilland DHC-6-300 (registration N824ED) operated by Earth Data Aviation was involved in an aviation accident near Fort Worth, TX. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: the loss of power to both engines for undetermined reasons during approach. Contributing factors were the pilot's failure to properly position the fuel selector in accordance with the landing checklist and the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing. This summary draws on records from the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive.

Sourcesthe U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archivePrimary reportUpdated 1781061362Data APIEditorial standards

A dual-engine aircraft lost power on approach; after a forced landing, fuel system examination revealed tanks partially full and selector in NORMAL position, though pilot reported using aft tank.

Incident Overview

Air traffic control cleared the aircraft for an instrument landing system (ILS) approach. As the airplane approached the glideslope intercept point, both engines lost power. Controllers vectored the airplane toward a nearby airport. After the aircraft exited the clouds, the pilot determined that the flight could not reach the intended airport.

Forced Landing and Accident Sequence

The pilot initiated a forced landing to a field. During the landing roll, the airplane crossed a road, and the right wing struck a tree. Subsequently, the nose landing gear separated when it struck a dirt berm. The airplane came to a stop in an upright position.

Fuel System Examination

Post-accident examination of the fuel system revealed that the aft main tank contained between one-third and one-half full of fuel, while the forward main tank was 90% full. The cockpit fuel selector for the main tanks was found in the NORMAL position. With the selector in the NORMAL position, the aft main tank supplies fuel to the left engine, and the forward main tank supplies fuel to the right engine. No discrepancies were found in the fuel system. When the fuel boost pumps were activated, fuel flowed from the fuel supply lines. The left and right airframe fuel filters, as well as the left and right engine fuel filters, each contained fuel.

Engine Examination

Examination of both engines revealed no anomalies that would have precluded the operation of the engines.

Pilot Report

The pilot reported that at the time of the dual engine failure, the fuel selector was positioned to select the aft tank, thereby feeding both engines from the aft fuel tank. He further reported that when both engines failed, he immediately switched the fuel selector to "NORMAL." The aircraft's flight manual directs the pilot to position the fuel selector to "NORMAL" prior to takeoff and for landing.

Investigation report by the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive. Original record: https://carol.ntsb.gov/event/20010116X00313. This page is a structured re-presentation; facts and quotes are in the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), United States.