Casualties unknown

2001-09-25: Piper PA-32RT-300T (N39945) — Westline Construction — Medina, OH

Medina, OH, US

On September 25, 2001, a Piper PA-32RT-300T (registration N39945) operated by Westline Construction was involved in an aviation accident near Medina, OH. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: fatigue failure of the dual magneto mounting flanges that resulted from undetected contact damage sustained during a previous installation, which resulted in its separation from the engine during take-off. This summary draws on records from the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive.

Sourcesthe U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archivePrimary reportUpdated 1781061362Data APIEditorial standards

After takeoff, a pilot heard an engine pop and lost power, leading to a forced landing into trees. Investigation found a newly installed factory remanufactured magneto had separated from the engine due to fatigue on mounting flanges, with evidence of mismatched clamping blocks.

Event Summary

After takeoff, the pilot heard the engine "pop" followed by a loss of engine power, which resulted in a forced landing into trees.

Investigation Findings

Examination of the engine revealed that a newly installed factory remanufactured single-drive dual magneto had separated from the engine. It had accumulated 17.9 hours at the time of the accident.

Examination of the magneto and the installed clamping blocks revealed that the mounting flanges on both sides of the distributor housing exhibited fatigue beach marks. Examination of the mounting flanges also revealed that there were two sets of contact marks. The smaller more linear inboard set of marks matched the contour of the installed magneto clamping blocks when tilted slightly. These marks only penetrated slightly into the surface of the flanges. The installed clamping blocks appeared to meet the shape and dimensional requirements of older style clamping blocks issued by the engine manufacturer.

The other marks were wider with curved ends that did not match any feature of the older style installed clamping blocks. A small step was apparent at the edge of the larger contact area indicating removal or displacement of material from the surface. The marks did however appear to match the configuration and shape for newer style clamping blocks introduced by the engine manufacturer on engines produced after March 1985.

According to the engine manufacturer, the change was instituted as a production product improvement and the use of the newer clamping blocks was not a mandatory requirement on the engine installed in this airplane.

Magneto Manufacturing Details

According to the magneto manufacturer, the magneto housings are stripped of paint and dipped into a dichromate bath for corrosion prevention during the remanufacturing process. They were subjected to an inspection for cracks, but the inspection was only visual.

Investigation report by the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive. Original record: https://carol.ntsb.gov/event/20011001X02018. This page is a structured re-presentation; facts and quotes are in the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), United States.