Casualties unknown

2002-01-20: Mcdonnell Douglas DC-9-32 (N837AT) — Dulles, VA

Dulles, VA, US

On January 20, 2002, a Mcdonnell Douglas DC-9-32 (registration N837AT) was involved in an aviation accident near Dulles, VA. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The lack of direction from the operator on how to perform pushbacks on an icy ramp, which led to the tug driver positioning the tug at an angle to the nose of the airplane that allowed the airplane to move forward and strike the tug. This summary draws on records from the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive.

Sourcesthe U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archivePrimary reportUpdated 1781061362Data APIEditorial standards

A parked DC-9-32 struck its tug during pushback on an icy ramp. The tug driver lacked a headset, and the walker monitoring communication was looking away.

Aircraft and Conditions

A McDonnell Douglas DC-9-32 was parked at the gate. The auxiliary power unit (APU) was inoperative. The ramp was covered with snow and ice.

Pushback Procedure

The captain reported that a single-engine cross-bleed start would require about 80% N1 on the operative engine, so he decided to start both engines at the gate and then proceed with pushback. According to the operator's manual, if a headset was used, it was to be worn by the tug driver. However, the tug driver did not wear the headset because its cord had been broken and repaired multiple times and was too short to reach the tug driver. Instead, a walker near the nose of the airplane wore the headset.

The Incident

During pushback, the tug driver attempted to push the nose of the airplane to the west. The airplane encountered icy conditions, moved forward, and struck the tug. At the time of loss of traction, the tug was nearly 90 degrees to the right side of the airplane's nose. The tug driver observed the forward movement and stopped the tug, but without a headset, he could not notify the cockpit crew. The walker wearing the headset reported that he was looking away and did not see the airplane moving forward in time to call the cockpit.

The pushback was performed by a contract crew that had been trained in accordance with the airline's Ground Movement Manual (GMM). The GMM did not contain specific directions for pushbacks on icy surfaces.

Investigation report by the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive. Original record: https://carol.ntsb.gov/event/20020214X00216. This page is a structured re-presentation; facts and quotes are in the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), United States.