Casualties unknown

Helicopter Damaged After Tail Boom Support Fitting Failure (N9471F)

Sullivan, OH, US

On May 3, 2006, a Hughes 269B (registration N9471F) was involved in an aviation accident near Sullivan, OH. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: Fatigue failure of the fuselage-to-tail boom cluster fitting, and the secondary failure of the tail rotor drive shaft. An additional cause was the incomplete compliance with an applicable Airworthiness Directive. A factor was the ditch. This summary draws on records from the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive.

Sourcesthe U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archivePrimary reportUpdated 2026-06-10Data APIEditorial standards

A helicopter sustained substantial damage when a tail boom support fitting failed in cruise, leading to tail rotor drive shaft failure. The pilot autorotated and hit a ditch, collapsing the right skid. Examination revealed fatigue on the fitting.

Accident

During cruise flight, the pilot heard a very loud bang and the helicopter began to yaw, indicating a loss of tail rotor authority. The pilot set up for a run-on landing to a field but then heard a metal grinding sound and a high pitched squealing noise, prompting an immediate autorotation. The pilot reported a sensation of the tail boom swinging in multiple directions. During touchdown, the helicopter encountered a ditch, causing the right skid to collapse. Upon exiting, the pilot observed that the left main tail boom support (cluster) fitting had broken loose from the frame.

Examination

The tail rotor drive shaft and cluster fitting were examined by the National Transportation Safety Board Materials Laboratory. The drive shaft damage was consistent with an overstress failure and appeared to result from rotational contact with the forward tail boom closure fitting. The cluster fitting exhibited fracture markings indicative of fatigue, with localized fatigue origin areas on the outer surfaces of both lugs.

Background

FAA Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2003-13-15 R1, effective August 10, 2004, applied to the accident aircraft. The AD required modification or replacement of original cluster fittings (part numbers 269A2234 and 269A2235) within 6 months or 150 hours time-in-service, and dye penetrant inspections at intervals not exceeding 50 hours until compliance. The nominal lug thickness was 0.076 inch, consistent with the original configuration. The failed lug did not appear modified or in compliance with the AD. Review of the aircraft logbook showed a 100-hour/annual inspection on May 23, 2005, noting AD 2003-13-15 R1, with compliance recorded via a dye penetrant inspection that found no cracks, but the modification kit was not installed.

Investigation report by the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive. Original record: https://carol.ntsb.gov/event/20060511X00548. This page is a structured re-presentation; facts and quotes are in the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), United States.