Boeing 747 Winglet Collision with Parked Aircraft at Madrid-Barajas

Casualties unknown • Aeropuerto de Madrid-Barajas (Madrid), ES

A Boeing 747-400 collided with a parked Embraer EMB-135 during taxiing at Madrid-Barajas Airport after inadvertently entering a restricted construction zone.

What happened

On July 15, 2006, a Thai International Airlines Boeing 747-400, registration HS-TGY, was taxiing at Madrid-Barajas Airport for a scheduled flight to Rome. During the taxi maneuver, the flight crew inadvertently entered taxiway I-8, an area undergoing construction work. Due to the ongoing works, the taxiway centerline had been displaced, and a NOTAM was in effect restricting the use of this taxiway to aircraft with a wingspan no larger than an Airbus A-321.

As the aircraft proceeded through the construction zone, the crew noted the narrowing path and expressed concern regarding clearance for the right wing. Despite the co-pilot attempting to apply brakes, the right winglet of the Boeint 747-400 struck the T-tail of a parked Embraer EMB-135, registration F-GOHC. The impact caused the T-tail of the Embraer to detach and fall to the ground. The Boeing 747-400 sustained damage to its right winglet, while the Embraer EMB-135 suffered major structural damage. There were no fatalities, though the crew of the Embraer was on board at the time of the collision.

The investigation

The CIAIAC investigation examined the aircraft's flight data, airport signage, and air traffic control (ATC) procedures. Investigators found that the flight crew was following a modified taxi route suggested by ATC to avoid congestion, which led them away from the standard published path. The investigation also reviewed the airport's signaling, noting that a horizontal ground sign at the junction was not in full compliance with standard norms, as the directional arrow was at a 45-degree angle rather than 90 degrees.

Furthermore, the investigation identified that the aircraft's onboard Jeppesen charts lacked the necessary detail to navigate the complex taxiway network at Madrid-Barajas effectively. The investigation also noted that the cockpit voice recorder (CVR) data for the immediate moments of impact was lost because the device remained powered for over two hours following the event, allowing the relevant audio to be overwritten.

Findings

  • The primary cause of the accident was that the flight crew failed to adequately assess the clearance between the aircraft's right wing and the parked Embraer EMB-135 after inadvertently entering taxiway I-8.
  • The aircraft entered a restricted area where construction work had reduced the available taxiway width, making it unsuitable for a large-span aircraft like the Boeing 747-400.
  • Air traffic control surveillance was reduced because the ground movement frequencies for the South sector had been unified, leaving only one controller monitoring the area.
  • The flight crew's onboard charts were insufficiently detailed for the complex taxiway environment at the airport.
  • The ATCO was focused on other aircraft in a different sector at the moment the collision occurred and was unable to intervene.

Probable cause

The accident occurred because the flight crew failed to maintain adequate separation between the aircraft's right wing and a parked obstacle after deviating into a restricted construction zone. This was compounded by reduced ATC surveillance due to unified radio frequencies and insufficient detail in the crew's navigation charts.

Frequently asked questions

What happened in the 2006-07-15 Boeing B747-400 accident near Aeropuerto de Madrid-Barajas (Madrid), ES?

A Boeing 747-400 collided with a parked Embraer EMB-135 during taxiing at Madrid-Barajas Airport after inadvertently entering a restricted construction zone.

What aircraft was involved and where did it happen?

The accident on 2006-07-15 involved a Boeing B747-400, registration HS-TGY, at Aeropuerto de Madrid-Barajas (Madrid), ES.

What was the probable cause of the accident?

The accident occurred because the flight crew failed to maintain adequate separation between the aircraft's right wing and a parked obstacle after deviating into a restricted construction zone. This was compounded by reduced ATC surveillance due to unified radio frequencies and insufficient detail in the crew's…

Investigation report by the Spanish Civil Aviation Accident and Incident Investigation Commission (CIAIAC). Original record: https://www.transportes.gob.es/recursos_mfom/2006_040_a_eng.pdf. This page is a structured re-presentation; facts and quotes are in the Comision de Investigacion de Accidentes e Incidentes de Aviacion Civil (CIAIAC), Spain - Ministerio de Transportes y Movilidad Sostenible.

Loading the flight search…