Casualties unknown

1995-05-01: Air Sandy Inc. Registration PA-31 Navajo C-GYPZ — Bearskin Airlines Fairchild Metro 23 C-GYYB and — Sioux Lookout, Ontario 12 nm NW, CA

Sioux Lookout, Ontario 12 nm NW, CA

On May 1, 1995, an Air Sandy Inc. Registration PA-31 Navajo C-GYPZ operated by Bearskin Airlines Fairchild Metro 23 C-GYYB and was involved in an aviation accident near Sioux Lookout, Ontario 12 nm NW, CA. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The Board determined that neither flight crew saw the other aircraft in time to avoid the collision. Contributing to the occurrence were the inherent limitations of the see-and-avoid concept which preclude the effective separation of aircraft with high… This summary draws on records from the Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB).

Sourcesthe Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB)Primary reportUpdated 1785068748Data APIEditorial standards

A Piper PA-31 Navajo and a Fairchild Swearingen Metro 23 collided at 4,500 feet near Sioux Lookout, Ontario. All eight occupants were fatally injured. The investigation determined that neither crew saw the other in time, citing limitations of the see-and-avoid concept and lack of electronic alerting.

History

Flight 3101, operated by Air Sandy, was a Piper PA-31 Navajo carrying one pilot and four passengers. It departed Sioux Lookout on a visual flight rules flight to Red Lake, Ontario. Flight 362, operated by Bearskin Airlines, was a Fairchild Swearingen Metro 23 with two pilots and one passenger, inbound from Red Lake under instrument flight rules. The collision occurred at 4,500 feet above sea level, approximately 12 nautical miles northwest of Sioux Lookout, at 1328 central daylight saving time. The Winnipeg area control centre had advised the Sioux Lookout Flight Service specialist of Bearskin 362's approach. Bearskin 362 cancelled IFR and was receiving an airport advisory when an emergency locator transmitter signal was heard. A pilot in the vicinity reported seeing a bright flare and a fire on the ground. The wreckage of the Air Sandy aircraft was found in a wooded area, and the Bearskin aircraft crashed into Lac Seul.

Aircraft Information

Bearskin 362 (C-GYYB) was a 1993 Fairchild SA227-CC Metro 23 powered by two Garrett TPE331 turboprop engines. It had a valid certificate of airworthiness and was within weight and balance limits. Air Sandy 3101 (C-GYPZ) was a 1976 Piper PA-31-350 Navajo powered by two Lycoming TIO-540 piston engines. It had been modified with a vortex generator kit, increasing maximum takeoff weight to 7,250 pounds. Both aircraft were properly maintained in accordance with regulations.

Personnel

The Bearskin flight crew consisted of a 27-year-old captain with 7,330 total flight hours and a 30-year-old first officer with 2,810 hours. Both held airline transport pilot licenses and were certified for the flight. The Air Sandy flight was operated by a 29-year-old captain with a commercial pilot license and 1,250 total hours, including 1,000 hours on the Navajo. All pilots were trained to Transport Canada standards. The Flight Service specialist on duty was qualified and had no medical issues.

Meteorological Conditions

Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time. The area forecast indicated scattered cumulus clouds based at 4,000 to 5,000 feet asl, with visibility greater than six miles. The reported weather at Sioux Lookout about 28 minutes before the collision included scattered clouds at 3,500 feet agl, overcast at 8,000 feet agl, visibility 15 miles, and wind from 210 degrees at 6 knots. A witness in a Beech 99 at 4,000 feet asl reported unlimited visibility below a solid overcast at 6,500 feet asl.

Investigation

The Transportation Safety Board of Canada determined that neither flight crew saw the other aircraft in time to avoid the collision. Contributing factors included the inherent limitations of the see-and-avoid concept in separating aircraft with high closure rates, the lack of direct alerting from the Flight Service specialist or onboard electronic equipment, and an apparent lack of pilot understanding of how to optimize avoidance maneuvering.

Probable cause

The Board determined that neither flight crew saw the other aircraft in time to avoid the collision. Contributing to the occurrence were the inherent limitations of the see-and-avoid concept which preclude the effective separation of aircraft with high closure rates, the fact that neither crew was directly alerted to the presence of the other aircraft by the Flight Service specialist or by onboard electronic equipment, and an apparent lack of pilot understanding of how to optimize avoidance manoeuvring.