Casualties unknown

: B737, (PH-XRE) — Aeroporto di Pisa, IT

Aeroporto di Pisa, IT

On an unknown date, a B737, (registration PH-XRE) was involved in an aviation accident near Aeroporto di Pisa, IT. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The nose-up (tail lift) of the aircraft, resulting in propeller contact with the ground, was caused by excessively abrupt braking due to simultaneous brake application by both pilots; a contributing factor was suboptimal cockpit communication between the… This summary draws on records from the Italian National Flight Safety Agency (ANSV).

Sourcesthe Italian National Flight Safety Agency (ANSV)Primary reportUpdated 1785083425Data APIEditorial standards
Aircraft registered PH-XRE
Aircraft registered PH-XRE. Photo: Mark Harkin / CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

On 7 June 2007, a Mudry CAP 10B (I-IZAJ) during taxi after landing at Viterbo Airport pitched nose-down, striking the propeller and lower fuselage. Both occupants were uninjured. The incident was attributed to abrupt braking from simultaneous application by both pilots, with suboptimal cockpit communication as a contributing factor.

Event Description

On 7 June 2007 at 16:27 local time, a Mudry CAP 10B aircraft, registration I-IZAJ, experienced a nose-down pitch event during taxi at Viterbo Airport (LIRV). The aircraft had landed on runway 22R and was decelerating. As the crew prepared to reverse direction, the nose dropped until the propeller spinner and the lower fuselage contacted the runway surface. The aircraft came to rest in that nose-down attitude, with damage to the propeller tips, spinner, and wheel fairings. Both occupants, an instructor and a student pilot, were uninjured.

Aircraft Information

The Mudry CAP 10B is a two-seat, single-engine, low-wing monoplane with a wooden structure, designed for initial aerobatic training. It has a fixed tailwheel landing gear. The aircraft (serial number 251, built 1990) was equipped with an Avro Lycoming AEIO-360-B2F engine (134 kW) and a fixed-pitch two-blade propeller. Its maximum takeoff mass is 830 kg (780 kg in aerobatic category).

Personnel Information

The instructor, a 39-year-old male, held a valid CPL(A) with ratings for single-engine and multi-engine piston land aircraft, instrument, flight instructor, instrument instructor, aerobatic flight, and aerobatic flight instructor. He had approximately 2,900 total flight hours, including 500 hours on type. The student pilot, a 29-year-old female, held a CPL(A) obtained in November 2002, with single-engine and multi-engine piston land and instrument ratings. She had about 1,114 total flight hours, with 2 hours on type.

Meteorological and Aerodrome Information

At the time of the event, visibility was greater than 10 km, wind from 240° at 12 knots. Viterbo Airport (elevation 302 m) is a military airfield open to the local Aero Club. The runway in use, 04L/22R, is asphalt, 1,005 m long and 25 m wide, and was dry.

Analysis

The aircraft had departed at 16:07 local time for a VFR training flight aimed at obtaining an instructor rating. After the training area activity, the crew returned to Viterbo. The student pilot was at the controls. The approach, touchdown, and deceleration roll were normal. Near the end of the roll, the crew requested and received permission to reverse direction and back-taxi. Shortly after beginning the maneuver, the instructor told the student to stop. Perceiving a delay in execution, the instructor applied the brakes at the same moment the student also began braking. This simultaneous action resulted in abrupt brake application, causing the tail to lift and the propeller to strike the runway. The low speed prevented a full nose-over, and the aircraft stopped in a nose-down attitude, supported by the spinner and lower nose.

The CAP 10B's tailwheel configuration places the center of gravity behind the main wheels when on the ground. During braking, the resultant forces can cause a rotation about the main wheel axle, lifting the tail. Both pilots were aware of this characteristic. The event underscores the importance of clear communication in the cockpit, especially during low-workload phases like taxi. Any change of control should be preceded by a standardized verbal exchange to avoid simultaneous inputs.

Probable cause

The nose-up (tail lift) of the aircraft, resulting in propeller contact with the ground, was caused by excessively abrupt braking due to simultaneous brake application by both pilots; a contributing factor was suboptimal cockpit communication between the instructor and the student pilot.