Two passengers injured during severe turbulence over Japan

Casualties unknown • KR

An Asiana Airlines Airbus A330-300 encountered severe atmospheric disturbances over Shimane Prefecture, resulting in two serious injuries to passengers.

What happened

On August 21, 2012, an Asiana Airlines Airbus A330-300, registration HL8258, was operating a scheduled flight from Honolulu to Incheon. While cruising at approximately 40,000 feet over Matsue City, Japan, the aircraft encountered intense atmospheric disturbances. The flight experienced rapid changes in wind direction and speed, accompanied by strong updrafts and significant vertical acceleration, reaching 1.88G.

During the period of instability, the aircraft's speed momentarily exceeded the maximum operating limit, triggering an overspeed warning. The pilot in command disengaged the autopilot to manually stabilize the aircraft, during which time the plane experienced significant pitch and roll oscillations. The turbulence was severe enough to cause physical harm in the cabin: one passenger walking in the rear aisle sustained serious injuries, and a second passenger, who had unbuckled their seatbelt to assist the first, was also seriously injured when a subsequent bout of shaking occurred.

The investigation

The investigation, conducted by the Japan Transport Safety Board, analyzed data from the Digital Flight Data Recorder (DFDR) and Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR), alongside interviews with the flight crew and cabin attendants. Investigators examined the aircraft's flight path, weather radar status, and the crew's response to the turbulence. The investigation also involved external analysis of meteorological data to understand the nature of the atmospheric conditions encountered.

Findings

  • The primary cause of the passenger injuries was the severe shaking of the aircraft while passengers were not properly restrained.
  • The initial encounter with severe turbulence was likely caused by the aircraft passing through or near cumulonimbus clouds, characterized by intense wind shear and updrafts.
  • The flight crew failed to notice that the weather radar was turned off, which prevented them from identifying the convective activity ahead.
  • Insufficient monitoring of weather conditions and cockpit instruments by the pilot in command and the route captain contributed to the encounter with the unstable air.
  • The pilot's manual control inputs following the disengagement of the autopilot may have influenced the secondary period of intense shaking.

Safety action

Following the incident, Asiana Airlines implemented several safety enhancements, including reinforced training for flight crews on turbulence briefings, improved monitoring of real-time weather via ATC and radar, and stricter adherence to seatbelt sign protocols. The airline also emphasized the importance of using standard ICAO terminology, such as "Severe Turbulence," when communicating with Air Traffic Control to ensure accurate information is disseminated to following aircraft.

Probable cause

The injuries were caused by severe aircraft shaking while passengers were unrestrained. The turbulence itself resulted from the aircraft encountering convective activity (cumulonimbus) because the crew failed to notice the weather radar was inactive due to inadequate instrument monitoring.

Frequently asked questions

What happened in the 2014-07-25 - They can expect large variations in altitude, but should not chase altitude. accident near KR?

An Asiana Airlines Airbus A330-300 encountered severe atmospheric disturbances over Shimane Prefecture, resulting in two serious injuries to passengers.

What aircraft was involved and where did it happen?

The accident on 2014-07-25 involved a - They can expect large variations in altitude, but should not chase altitude., registration HL8258, at KR.

What was the probable cause of the accident?

The injuries were caused by severe aircraft shaking while passengers were unrestrained. The turbulence itself resulted from the aircraft encountering convective activity (cumulonimbus) because the crew failed to notice the weather radar was inactive due to inadequate instrument monitoring.

Loading the flight search…