Casualties unknown

2019-08-08: Bombardier Inc DHC-8-315 (VH-SCE) — Eastern Australia Airlines — 80 km SSE of Whyalla Airport, South Australia

80 km SSE of Whyalla Airport, South Australia

On August 8, 2019, a Bombardier Inc DHC-8-315 (registration VH-SCE) operated by Eastern Australia Airlines was involved in an aviation accident near 80 km SSE of Whyalla Airport, South Australia. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: These findings should not be read as apportioning blame or liability to any particular organisation or individual. This summary draws on records from the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB).

Sourcesthe Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB)Primary reportUpdated 1779788736Data APIEditorial standards
Aircraft registered VH-SCE
Aircraft registered VH-SCE. Photo: Bidgee / CC BY-SA 3.0 au, via Wikimedia Commons

A ditching dam cover opened during approach to Whyalla Airport, with the reason undetermined. Prior severe weather may have affected security, and post-occurrence inspection suggested possible improper engagement. Cabin crew appropriately alerted flight crew, and management followed non-normal checklists.

Occurrence

The ditching dam cover opened while the flight crew had initiated sterile cockpit procedures for approach to Whyalla Airport. At the time, conditions were benign, although the aircraft had operated in severe icing and turbulence earlier in the flight. The specific reason for the cover opening could not be determined.

Effects of the Opening

Once the cover partially opened, aerodynamic forces drove it fully open, allowing the dam bag to unfurl into the airstream. The bag, cover, and inflation hose subsequently struck the fuselage repeatedly, producing a loud noise heard by the occupants. The ATSB noted that, given the device's location, if any part had come loose, further damage to the aircraft was unlikely.

Examination Findings

Prior to the flight, the cover was reported as secure. However, post-occurrence replacement of the ditching dam revealed that it did not initially meet the required engagement tolerance into the airframe retaining channel. This raised the possibility that the occurrence cover may have appeared visually secure during the pre-flight inspection while not being properly engaged. The ATSB considered that earlier exposure to severe weather may have affected the security of the cover, though conditions were benign when the device opened.

Crew Actions

The cabin crew chose to break the sterile cockpit environment to inform the flight crew of the issue. While this had the potential to distract from other flying-related tasks, the ATSB considered that the need to inform the flight crew of an abnormal situation of unknown severity appropriately balanced that risk. Management of the unexpected deployment was controlled through the use of non‑normal checklists and effective resource management.