No fatalities

2015-08-01: Beechcraft 90 King Air (N257CQ) — Absher Air — Georgetown, United States of America

Georgetown, United States of AmericaLanding (descent or approach)

On August 1, 2015, a Beechcraft 90 King Air (registration N257CQ) operated by Absher Air was involved in an aviation accident near Georgetown, United States of America during landing or approach. No fatalities were reported. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: Undetermined based on the available evidence. This summary draws on records from the Bureau of Aircraft Accidents Archives (B3A).

Sourcesthe Bureau of Aircraft Accidents Archives (B3A)Primary reportUpdated 1781192900Data APIEditorial standards

During the third flight segment, a fuel crossfeed light illuminated, leading the pilot to divert. The right engine lost power and was feathered, then electrical failure occurred after gear extension. The aircraft impacted an embankment, resulting in substantial damage. Postaccident exam found no mechanical anomalies; probable cause undetermined.

Event Summary

The accident airplane was fueled with 140 gallons before the second of three flight segments. While en route on the third segment, a fuel crossfeed light illuminated. The pilot reset the indicator and decided to land to troubleshoot, requesting a divert to the nearest airport, which was directly beneath the airplane. Subsequently, the right engine lost power, and the autofeather system feathered the right engine propeller. The pilot reduced power on the left engine, lowered the nose, and extended the landing gear while entering the traffic pattern. After gear extension, the pilot reported that the electrical system "failed." Shortly after, the left engine did not respond to power lever inputs. On a base leg approach, the airplane was below the intended flightpath to reach the runway. The pilot stated that he pulled "gently on the control wheel," but the airplane impacted an embankment and came to rest on airport property. This resulted in substantial damage to both wings and the fuselage.

Postaccident Examination

Postaccident examination of the engines and airframe revealed no evidence of mechanical malfunctions or abnormalities that would have precluded normal operation. Signatures on the left propeller indicated that the engine was likely producing power at the time of impact; however, actual power settings could not be conclusively determined. Signatures on the right propeller indicated that little or no power was being produced. The quantity of fuel in the airplane's fuel system, as well as the configuration of the fuel system at the time of the accident, could not be determined based on the available evidence.

Possible Electrical System Issue

Although the position of the master switch (which includes the battery, generator 1, and generator 2) was found in the OFF position, the airplane had been operating for about 30 minutes when the electrical power was lost; thus, it is likely that the airplane had been operating on battery power throughout the flight. This could have been the result of the pilot's failure to activate, or his inadvertent deactivation of, the generator 1 and 2 switch. If the flight were operating on battery power, it would explain what the pilot described as an electrical system failure after the landing gear extension due to the exhaustion of the airplane's battery.

Engine and Propeller Analysis

The postaccident examination of the left engine and propeller revealed that the engine was likely producing some power at the time of impact, and an explanation for why the engine reportedly did not respond to the pilot's throttle movements could not be determined. Additionally, given the available evidence, the reason for the loss of power to the right engine could not be determined.

Probable cause

Undetermined based on the available evidence.