No fatalities

1984-10-20: Cessna 414 Chancellor (N1597T) — Metropolitan International Investment & Security — Cheyenne, United States of America

Cheyenne, United States of AmericaTakeoff (climb)

On October 20, 1984, a Cessna 414 Chancellor (registration N1597T) operated by Metropolitan International Investment & Security was involved in an aviation accident near Cheyenne, United States of America during takeoff. No fatalities were reported. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: Occurrence #1: in flight encounter with weather - Phase of operation: takeoff - roll/run - Findings: (f) weather condition - fog; (f) weather condition - snow; (c) flight into known adverse weather - performed - pilot in command; (f) overconfidence in… This summary draws on records from the Bureau of Aircraft Accidents Archives (B3A).

Sourcesthe Bureau of Aircraft Accidents Archives (B3A)Primary reportUpdated 1781219035Data APIEditorial standards

An aircraft departing in IFR snow conditions was seen staggering into the air, then struck power lines and crashed into homes. Investigation found ice accumulation and overweight.

Accident Overview

An aircraft departed an airport in instrument flight rules (IFR) conditions with snow falling. Witnesses observed the aircraft staggering into the air shortly after takeoff. During the initial climb, the aircraft struck power lines and subsequently crashed into homes in a residential area.

Investigation Findings

Post-accident investigation revealed that the aircraft had accumulated ice prior to the accident. Additionally, the aircraft exceeded its certified maximum gross weight at the time of the flight. No evidence was found of any failure or malfunction of the airframe, flight controls, or engine before the aircraft impacted the power lines.

Probable Cause

The official probable cause determination lists multiple findings across three occurrences. Occurrence #1, an in-flight encounter with weather during the takeoff roll/run, found fog and snow weather conditions, flight into known adverse weather by the pilot in command, and overconfidence in personal ability by the pilot in command. Occurrence #2, an in-flight collision with an object during initial climb, found the object was a static wire, and that proper climb rate was not maintained by the pilot in command, with aircraft weight and balance exceeded by the pilot in command. Occurrence #3, an in-flight collision with terrain/water during an uncontrolled descent, is included in the findings.