No fatalities

2018-11-30: Cessna 550 Citation II (N941JM) — Dirt Dynamics — Fargo-Hector, United States of America

Fargo-Hector, United States of AmericaLanding (descent or approach)

On November 30, 2018, a Cessna 550 Citation II (registration N941JM) operated by Dirt Dynamics was involved in an aviation accident near Fargo-Hector, United States of America during landing or approach. No fatalities were reported. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The pilot's failure to lower the flaps during the approach and maintain sufficient airspeed while flying in instrument meteorological and icing conditions and the accumulation of ice on the wings' leading edges, which resulted in the exceedance of the… This summary draws on records from the Bureau of Aircraft Accidents Archives (B3A).

Sourcesthe Bureau of Aircraft Accidents Archives (B3A)Primary reportUpdated 1781191133Data APIEditorial standards

A commercial pilot conducting a cross-country business flight with 10 passengers on an 8-passenger airplane experienced an aerodynamic stall during an ILS approach in icing conditions. The pilot did not lower the flaps and maintained low airspeed, leading to a loss of control.

Accident Details

A commercial pilot was conducting a cross-country business flight with 10 passengers on board an 8-passenger airplane. Air traffic control cleared the flight for an instrument landing system (ILS) approach to the runway. While descending, the airplane entered instrument meteorological conditions (IMC) at 3,100 ft mean sea level (msl), and ice started to accumulate on the wing's leading edges, empennage, and windshield. The pilot activated the pneumatic deice boots multiple times during the approach and slowed the airplane to 120 knots. The airplane then exited the clouds about 400 ft above ground level (agl), and the pilot maintained 120 knots as the airplane flew over the airport fence; all indications for landing were normal.

About 100 ft agl, the airplane started to pull right. The pilot applied left correction inputs, but the airplane continued to pull right. He applied engine power to conduct a go-around, but the airplane landed in grass to the right of the runway, sustaining damage to the wings and landing gear. Witnesses and passengers reported that the airplane stalled.

Post-Accident Examination

During examination of the airplane immediately after the accident, about 1/2 to 1 inch of mixed ice was found on the right wing's leading edge, the vertical and horizontal stabilizers, and the angle of attack probe. Ice was also observed on the windshield. The flaps were found in the "up" position. Flight control continuity was established.

Pilot Qualifications

Although the airplane was originally certificated for two-pilot operation, the pilot was flying the airplane under a single-pilot exemption. The pilot received a logbook endorsement indicating that he had received single-pilot training and was properly qualified under the single-pilot exemption. However, he had not met the turbine flight time qualifications (1,000 hours) to be properly authorized to conduct the flight under the single-pilot exemption because he only had 500 hours.

Cockpit Voice Recorder and Radar Data

A review of cockpit voice recorder information indicated that, although the pilot verbalized that the landing gear was "all green," followed by stating "check, check, check," he did not verbalize all the approach or landing checklist items nor did he make any audible comments about activating the pneumatic deice boots or windshield anti-ice. A review of radar data for the flight indicated that, during the last 2 minutes of flight, while the airplane was on final approach to the runway, the indicated airspeed got as low as 99 knots. The last recorded radar return indicated that the airplane had an airspeed of 104 knots at 900 ft msl.

Probable Cause

The pilot's failure to lower the flaps during the approach and maintain sufficient airspeed while flying in instrument meteorological and icing conditions and the accumulation of ice on the wings' leading edges, which resulted in the exceedance of the airplane's critical angle of attack and subsequent aerodynamic stall. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's lack of proper qualification to operate the airplane under a single-pilot exemption due to his lack of total turbine time, which led to task saturation and his failure to properly configure the flaps for landing.