Casualties unknown

Grumman G164 B Collision with Power Lines During Low-Level Spraying

Conséquences, FR

On October 3, 2012, a Grumman G164 B was involved in an aviation accident near Conséquences, FR. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The accident was caused by the pilot confusing two electrical lines. The low overflight altitude did not guarantee clearance of the obstacle. This summary draws on records from the French Bureau d'Enquêtes et d'Analyses (BEA).

Sourcesthe French Bureau d'Enquêtes et d'Analyses (BEA)Primary reportUpdated 2026-10-18Data APIEditorial standards

On October 3, 2012, a Grumman G164 B (F-GVDJ) crashed near Aigues-Mortes after colliding with power lines during agricultural spraying. The pilot confused two parallel lines while flying low, resulting in the total loss of the aircraft.

Incident Overview

On Wednesday, October 3, 2012, at approximately 14:20 local time, a Grumman G164 B registered as F-GVDJ was destroyed in a collision with electrical infrastructure near Aigues-Mortes, France. The aircraft was engaged in low-altitude agricultural spraying operations when it struck power lines.

Operational Context and Sequence of Events

The pilot departed from the Montpellier Candillargues aerodrome around 14:10 to treat a field north of Aigues-Mortes. The target parcel was oriented northeast-southwest. Two distinct electrical lines were present in the area: one with pylons approximately 7 meters high located on the southwest border, and a second, larger line situated about 300 meters further southwest.

During the approach, the pilot clearly identified both lines while flying over them from the southwest. After performing a half-turn to align with the field axis (heading 220°), the pilot began spraying. While estimating altitude using lateral observations, the aircraft collided with the cables at approximately 6 meters above ground level. The impact dragged the plane for roughly 140 meters, knocking down two concrete pylons before it crashed into a cluster of trees.

Contributing Factors and Pilot Statement

The pilot reported confusing the two electrical lines, stating that attention was drawn to the more massive second line rather than the first. Although the pilot had previously surveyed the site and identified the obstacle, they cited glare from the sun, which was positioned nearly directly ahead (azimuth 196°, elevation 41°), as a visual impediment.

The pilot held 9,885 total flight hours, including 1,500 on type. On the morning of the accident, they had completed four hours and 55 minutes of spraying flights in three rotations between 07:30 and 13:00. The investigation noted that fatigue from this activity may have contributed to a temporary lapse in vigilance.

Environmental Conditions

Weather conditions at Montpellier Méditerranée, located 9 nautical miles away, included a wind from 160° at 5 knots, CAVOK visibility, and a temperature of 22°C. Examination of the wreckage confirmed impacts on both left and right guy wires.

Probable cause

The accident was caused by the pilot confusing two electrical lines. The low overflight altitude did not guarantee clearance of the obstacle. Sun glare diverted the pilot's attention to a more visible, massive line, and fatigue from prior activity may have contributed to a momentary decrease in vigilance.

Frequently asked questions

What happened in the 3 Oct 2012 Grumman G164 B accident near Conséquences, FR?

On October 3, 2012, a Grumman G164 B (F-GVDJ) crashed near Aigues-Mortes after colliding with power lines during agricultural spraying. The pilot confused two parallel lines while flying low, resulting in the total loss of the aircraft.

What aircraft was involved and where did it happen?

The accident on 3 Oct 2012 involved a Grumman G164 B, at Conséquences, FR.

What was the probable cause of the accident?

The accident was caused by the pilot confusing two electrical lines. The low overflight altitude did not guarantee clearance of the obstacle. Sun glare diverted the pilot's attention to a more visible, massive line, and fatigue from prior activity may have contributed to a momentary decrease in vigilance.