Casualties unknown

2011-02-06: Gulfstream G150 (D-CKDM) — Royal Air Force Northolt Airport, London, GB

Royal Air Force Northolt Airport, London, GB

On February 6, 2011, a Gulfstream G150 (registration D-CKDM) was involved in an aviation accident near Royal Air Force Northolt Airport, London, GB. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The most likely explanation for the lack of acceleration and rotation was that the brakes were being applied during the takeoff, probably as a result of inadvertent braking application by the commander, which caused a reduction in acceleration and a nose‑down… This summary draws on records from the UK Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB).

Sourcesthe UK Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB)Primary reportUpdated 1785053200Data APIEditorial standards
Aircraft registered D-CKDM
Aircraft registered D-CKDM. Photo: Björn Strey / CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

A Gulfstream G150 failed to rotate during takeoff from Northolt due to likely inadvertent brake application by the commander, resulting in a rejected takeoff and fire.

History of the Flight

On 6 February 2011, a Gulfstream G150 (registration D-CKDM) was preparing for a commercial flight from Royal Air Force Northolt Airport to Moscow. The aircraft had been parked for three days following an inbound flight. The two pilots and three passengers boarded, and the commander, who was the pilot flying, completed pre-flight checks. After receiving taxi clearance, the aircraft taxied to Runway 25 via Taxiway B. The crew performed a static takeoff procedure, holding the brakes until full takeoff power was set, then releasing them.

The takeoff roll appeared normal until the commander called for rotation at Vr. Pulling the control column back produced no response; even when fully aft, the aircraft only pitched up to 1°. As speed approached V2 (129 kt), the commander exclaimed about the lack of rotation. The pilot not flying (PNF) retarded the thrust levers, and both pilots applied brakes. The commander steered with the tiller to the right side of the runway before turning left. The aircraft stopped at the end of the paved surface, oriented approximately 150° magnetic.

After stopping, the commander attempted to taxi clear but the aircraft would not move. Smoke was seen from the left mainwheels. The cabin attendant tried to open the door but could not; the commander did so and evacuated with the passengers. One passenger suffered a twisted ankle during disembarkation. A fire around the left mainwheels was suppressed by the Rescue and Fire Fighting Service.

Flight Data and Analysis

Flight data showed acceleration during the takeoff roll was below normal. The investigation found no technical fault with the aircraft. The most likely explanation was that the brakes were being applied during takeoff, probably due to inadvertent braking by the commander. This reduced acceleration and created a nose-down pitching moment that prevented rotation. However, partial brake operation from another cause could not be ruled out.

Aircraft and Brake System

The Gulfstream G150 is a small business jet with conventional mechanical elevator and rudder controls. Brakes are applied by pressing the top of the rudder pedals, which actuate power brake valves. The commander typically kept his heels off the floor during taxi and takeoff, using rudder pedals for steering and guarding the tiller. He noted occasionally applying brakes inadvertently during taxi. The PNF kept his feet flat on the floor.

Brake assemblies on both main gears seized after the incident. Left main gear tyres and brakes suffered fire damage; the left outboard tyre deflated due to a blown fuse plug. Right main gear tyres were in good condition. The aircraft had 780 flying hours and 371 cycles at the time.

Personnel and Conditions

The commander, aged 32, held an ATPL and had 1,750 total hours (490 on type). This was his first flight as commander after conversion training. The co-pilot had 2,950 hours (400 on type). Both pilots had not previously operated from Northolt. Weather conditions were not specified in the report.

Probable cause

The most likely explanation for the lack of acceleration and rotation was that the brakes were being applied during the takeoff, probably as a result of inadvertent braking application by the commander, which caused a reduction in acceleration and a nose‑down pitching moment sufficient to prevent the aircraft from rotating. However, it could not be ruled out that another factor had caused partial brake operation.