Casualties unknown

2003 Pisa Airport MD-82 Ground Collision (I-SMEM)

Aeroporto di Pisa, IT

On October 7, 2003, a MD-82, (registration I-SMEM) was involved in an aviation accident near Aeroporto di Pisa, IT. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The incident was attributed to the incorrect stopping position of the truck driver, which did not comply with signage regulations; the pilot-in-command's suboptimal assessment of separation from the stationary vehicle during taxiing; and the co-pilot's lack… This summary draws on records from the Italian National Flight Safety Agency (ANSV).

Sourcesthe Italian National Flight Safety Agency (ANSV)Primary reportUpdated 2026-09-13Data APIEditorial standards
Aircraft registered I-SMEM
Aircraft registered I-SMEM. Photo: Aero Icarus from Zürich, Switzerland / CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

On October 7, 2003, a Meridiana MD-82 (I-SMEM) struck a stationary truck while taxiing at Pisa Airport. The left wingtip hit the vehicle's cab, causing significant damage to both but no injuries to the 134 people on board.

Incident Overview

On October 7, 2003, at 11:55 UTC, a McDonnell Douglas MD-82 with registration I-SMEM, operated by Meridiana S.p.A., was involved in a ground collision at Pisa Airport (LIRP). The aircraft, which had just landed on a scheduled flight carrying 128 passengers and six crew members, was taxiing through "gate 2" toward its assigned parking spot. During this maneuver, the left wingtip of the aircraft struck a stationary Fiat-Iveco truck parked near the intersection of the perimeter road and gate 2.

Damage and Casualties

The collision resulted in no injuries to any persons on board or on the ground. However, significant damage was sustained by both vehicles. The MD-82 suffered damage to the extremity of its left wing, while the truck's driver's cabin was severely damaged. Despite the impact, the aircraft continued its taxiing maneuver autonomously to the parking area.

Contributing Factors

The investigation identified several factors contributing to the incident. The truck driver had stopped in an incorrect position, failing to adhere to the horizontal and vertical signage that required vehicles to stop 75 meters before the intersection. Additionally, the pilot-in-command did not adequately assess the separation between the aircraft and the stationary truck, despite a NOTAM warning of personnel and equipment on the apron. The co-pilot also failed to assist in monitoring obstacles, prioritizing post-landing checklist tasks instead.

Probable cause

The incident was attributed to the incorrect stopping position of the truck driver, which did not comply with signage regulations; the pilot-in-command's suboptimal assessment of separation from the stationary vehicle during taxiing; and the co-pilot's lack of effective cooperation in monitoring obstacles on the taxiway.