4 fatalities

2021-05-04: Mitsubishi MU-2 Marquise (N322TA) — Northshore Group — Hattiesburg-Bobby L. Chain, United States of America

Hattiesburg-Bobby L. Chain, United States of AmericaLanding (descent or approach)

On May 4, 2021, a Mitsubishi MU-2 Marquise (registration N322TA) operated by Northshore Group was involved in an aviation accident near Hattiesburg-Bobby L. Chain, United States of America during landing or approach. 4 people were killed. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The pilot’s failure to maintain control of the airplane during the night instrument approach which resulted in an inadvertent aerodynamic stall from which the pilot was unable to recover. This summary draws on records from the Bureau of Aircraft Accidents Archives (B3A).

Sourcesthe Bureau of Aircraft Accidents Archives (B3A)Primary reportUpdated 1781190075Data APIEditorial standards

An airplane impacted a private residence during a night instrument approach, consistent with an inadvertent aerodynamic stall. Postcrash fire destroyed the airplane.

Accident Overview

During a non-precision approach in instrument meteorological conditions at night, the pilot executed a procedure turn. As the airplane performed this turn, its airspeed decreased toward the stall speed before accelerating back to the standard approach speed. Following the final approach fix, the airplane's descent halted for approximately 30 seconds, then resumed at a rate of about 1,300 feet per minute.

Sequence of Events

The airplane decelerated and continued descending until the airspeed reached approximately 85 knots—about 7 knots above the calculated stall speed with flaps at 20 degrees—and the altitude was 500 feet mean sea level. The last recorded data point indicated the airplane at approximately 460 feet mean sea level and 750 feet from the accident site. The airplane subsequently impacted a private residence, resulting in a postcrash fire that destroyed the airplane. Impact signatures were consistent with a low-energy impact.

Examination Findings

Postaccident examination of the airframe and engines revealed no preimpact anomalies that would have precluded normal operations. Signatures on the engines and propellers were consistent with both engines producing power at impact. A review of the pilot's toxicological information found that the level of eszopiclone in the specimens was subtherapeutic and therefore not likely a factor in the accident.

Conclusion

The circumstances of the accident are consistent with an inadvertent aerodynamic stall from which the pilot was unable to recover.

Probable cause

The pilot’s failure to maintain control of the airplane during the night instrument approach which resulted in an inadvertent aerodynamic stall from which the pilot was unable to recover.