1 fatality

1996-02-08: Piper PA-31-350 Navajo Chieftain (VH-KIJ) — King Island Airlines — King Island-Currie, Australia

King Island-Currie, AustraliaLanding (descent or approach)

On February 8, 1996, a Piper PA-31-350 Navajo Chieftain (registration VH-KIJ) operated by King Island Airlines was involved in an aviation accident near King Island-Currie, Australia during landing or approach. One person was killed. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The pilot continued a visual approach in conditions which prevented him from maintaining adequate visual clearance from the ground or obstacles and which made visual judgement of the approach difficult. This summary draws on records from the Bureau of Aircraft Accidents Archives (B3A).

Sourcesthe Bureau of Aircraft Accidents Archives (B3A)Primary reportUpdated 1781207270Data APIEditorial standards

A pilot did not survive after crashing into trees near King Island aerodrome. The aircraft was on an NDB approach in cloudy conditions and did not execute a missed approach.

Incident Overview

At 0455 EST, a witness heard the aircraft pass over King Island aerodrome and observed the pilot-activated runway 10/28 lights illuminate. The pilot informed Melbourne Control of an intention to conduct a runway 10 non-directional beacon (NDB) approach. Shortly after, the pilot broadcast that the aircraft was at the minimum descent altitude of 640 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) for that approach, and also reported complete cloud cover.

Sequence of Events

Instead of initiating a missed approach, the aircraft was heard flying south-east from overhead the NDB, which is situated 1.3 km south-south-west of the runway 10/28 center. A second witness, located near the NDB site, observed the aircraft's lights heading south-east. At 0507, a farmer heard the aircraft pass low over his residence, and moments later it struck trees 3.5 km south-east of the aerodrome. First responders reached the crash site at approximately 0530 and found that the pilot had not survived.

Probable Cause

The official investigation determined that the pilot continued a visual approach in conditions that prevented him from maintaining adequate visual clearance from the ground or obstacles and that made visual judgment of the approach difficult. Additionally, the pilot probably did not recognize that the conditions were not suitable for a visual approach.