Casualties unknown

2021-12-09: Jabiru J430 (ZU-NDP) — First Beach at Port St Johns, Eastern Cape Province, ZA

First Beach at Port St Johns, Eastern Cape Province, ZA

On December 9, 2021, a Jabiru J430 (registration ZU-NDP) was involved in an aviation accident near First Beach at Port St Johns, Eastern Cape Province, ZA. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The engine failed due to a crankshaft fracture caused by fatigue and heat-induced wear, likely stemming from the installation of a non-approved conrod big end bearing. This summary draws on records from the South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA) Accident and Incident Investigations Division.

Sourcesthe South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA) Accident and Incident Investigations DivisionPrimary reportUpdated 1785104676Data APIEditorial standards
Aircraft registered ZU-NDP
Aircraft registered ZU-NDP. Photo: Bob Adams from George, South Africa / CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

A private flight experienced sudden engine power loss due to a fractured crankshaft, forcing the pilot to perform an emergency landing on a beach.

What happened

On the morning of 9 December 2021, a Jabiru J430 aircraft, registration ZU-NDP, was conducting a private flight from Wings Park Aerodrome near East London to Virginia Aerodrome in KwaZulu-Natal. Approximately one hour into the flight, while flying near Port St Johns in the Eastern Cape, the engine suffered a sudden loss of power followed by a complete shutdown. The pilot identified a suitable landing site on the beach at Port St Johns and executed a forced landing. During the touchdown, the nose gear struck soft sand, causing the aircraft to come to a stop with minor damage to the airframe.

The investigation

Following the incident, the engine was removed for a detailed teardown inspection. Investigators discovered that the crankshaft had sheared. Laboratory analysis of the fractured crankshaft assembly revealed that the failure originated at the No. 1 conrod big end position through a fatigue failure mode. Microscopic examination showed extensive post-failure corrosion, suggesting exposure to high temperatures. Furthermore, the investigation identified significant wear on the main journal and crankcase bearings. A critical discrepancy was found regarding the No. 1 conrod big end bearing, which featured a different part number than the other bearings in the assembly. This specific bearing was identified as a non-manufacturer-approved part.

Findings

  • The primary cause of the engine failure was a fractured crankshaft resulting from fatigue and heat-induced metal wear.
  • The No. 1 conrod big end bearing was not a manufacturer-approved component.
  • There was evidence of excessive wear and high-temperature exposure within the conrod assembly.
  • The aircraft was fitted with larger tyres than specified by the manufacturer, including a modified nose gear strut assembly, for which no formal modification application was found in the regulatory database.

Safety action

  • It is recommended that operators and Approved Maintenance Organisations (AMOs) verify that all engine and aircraft components are manufacturer-approved to prevent similar failures.
  • It is recommended that the SACAA conduct audits of operators and AMOs to ensure compliance with approved parts and maintenance standards.

Probable cause

The engine failed due to a crankshaft fracture caused by fatigue and heat-induced wear, likely stemming from the installation of a non-approved conrod big end bearing.