AN ACR MLG FO RPTS THAT TXWY G IS NOT LISTED ON THE COMMERCIALLY PREPARED ARPT PAGE FOR BUR.

Narrative

OUR ACFT WAS POSITIONED S OF AND PARALLEL TO RWY 8/26 AND WAS FACING W. ACTIVE DEP RWY FOR US WAS RWY 33. GND CTL INSTRUCTED US TO CROSS RWY 33 AND TAXI ON TXWY G TO RWY 33. WE REALIZED TXWY G WAS NOT ON THE ARPT DIAGRAM. THE ARPT DIAGRAM SHOWS THE W SIDE OF RWY 33 S OF RWY 8/26 TO BE AN OPEN CONCRETE AREA. WE COULD SEE A TXWY G SIGN ON THE OTHER SIDE OF RWY 33; MAKING IT LOOK LIKE TXWY G RAN N/S PARALLEL TO RWY 33; AND AFTER XING RWY 33; WE SHOULD TURN S ON TXWY G TO RWY 33. WE TAXIED ACROSS RWY 33 AND INTERCEPTED TXWY G. THE TAXIING WAS SOMEWHAT CONFUSING BECAUSE OF THE INABILITY TO DECIPHER THE TXWY SINCE IT WAS NOT ON THE 10-9 ARPT DIAGRAM. THIS WAS MADE MORE DIFFICULT SINCE IT WAS NIGHTTIME. I SUGGEST THAT THE COMMERCIAL 10-9 ARPT DIAGRAM FOR BURBANK BE UPDATED TO SHOW TXWY G AND THE INTXNS ALONG THE TXWY. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH REPORTER REVEALED THE FOLLOWING: THE RPTING FO STATES THAT THERE IS A SIGN DEPICTING TXWY G. THE WHOLE ISSUE IS THAT THERE IS NO TXWY G SHOWN ON THE COMMERCIAL ARPT PAGE. IN THE DARK OF NIGHT IT IS DIFFICULT TO FIND THE SIGN THE RPTR RARELY GETS TO BUR AND WAS NOT FAMILIAR WITH THE ARPT. THE RPTR IS NOT SURE IF THERE IS A TXWY LINE ON THE TARMAC DEPICTING TXWY G. RPTR CALLED BACK SEVERAL DAYS LATER AND STATED THAT THE DEC/93 CHART HAD TXWY G DEPICTED.