THE FLT OF AN FA22 OVERSHOT THE ASSIGNED ALT DURING DEP. DURING CHKLIST USE; THE ALT ALERTER WAS SET TO THE SID ALT RATHER THAN THE ASSIGNED ALT. DEP CTLR QUERIED THE FLC.

Narrative

FO AND I FLEW A FLT FROM MINNEAPOLIS TO ST CLOUD; MN. DURING OUR ACCEPTANCE CHKLIST; I COVERED AND REVIEWED THE FLT INSTS AND AVIONICS PORTION OF THE CHKLIST. WHEN I GOT TO THE ALT ALERTER; IT WAS SET TO 1800 FT; WHICH WAS SET BY THE PREVIOUS CREW THAT HAD LANDED AT MSP. BY THIS TIME; PRIOR TO STARTING THE ACCEPTANCE CHKLIST; THE FO HAS ACTIVATED THE CLRNC AND HAS NORMALLY SET THE ALT ALTERTER TO OUR INITIAL ALT. SINCE IT WAS SET TO 1800 FT; I SET IT TO 5000 FT WHICH IS THE SID ALT. 99.9 PERCENT OF THE TIME 5000 FT IS OUR INITIAL ALT. I SAID 'GOING TO 5000 FT?' AS I SET THE ALT ALERTER. THE FO WHO HAD WRITTEN THE CLRNC ON A TOLD CARD WHICH WAS IN HER POSSESSION; SAID NOTHING OF THE CONTRARY. PER PLT'S OPERATING MANUAL (POM); THE FO IS TO VERIFY MY VERBAL STATEMENTS DURING THIS PORTION OF THE ACCEPTANCE CHKLIST. SO AFTER STARTUP I TAXI AND TKOF ON RWY HEADING. WE WERE CLRED TO MSP DEP. AS THE FO (PNF) CONTACTED DEP SHE APPARENTLY SAID 'MSP DEP COMMUTER FLT XAXB WITH YOU PASSING (SOME ALT BELOW 3000 FT) FOR 5000 FT.' DEP ACKNOWLEDGED OUR CHK-IN AS WE CONTINUED OUR CLB THROUGH MODERATE ICE TO 5000 FT. TOPS WERE AT APPROX 4500 FT. AT APPROX 4800 FT MSL; DEP ASKED; 'VERIFY LEVELING AT 5000 FT?' FO RESPONDED; 'LEVELING AT 5000 FT; AS ASSIGNED.' AT THAT POINT; I QUESTIONED BOTH STATEMENTS WITH MY FO. SHE THEN REFERRED TO THE TOLD CARD WHICH SHE THEN SAID 'OUR CLRNC WAS TO 3000 FT NOT 5000 FT PER THE SID.' DEP SAID NOTHING ELSE AND HANDED US OFF TO ZMP AND WISHED US A GOOD DAY. PERHAPS DEP WAS AWARE AS WE WERE CLBING THROUGH 3000 FT THAT WE WOULD BE LEVELING AT 5000 FT. THERE WERE NO CONFLICTS WITH ANY OTHER ACFT. THIS ERROR WILL NEVER HAPPEN AGAIN AND I INTEND TO DISCUSS SOME SORT OF VERBAL CHANGE ON THE ACCEPTANCE CHK WITH MY CHIEF PLT SOON. WHEN THE CAPT SAYS GOING TO OR CLRED TO 5000 FT AS HE SETS OR POINTS TO THE ALT ALERTER; THE FO SHOULD SAY 'CONFIRMED' -- THIS SHOULD BE ADDED TO OUR POM. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 324680: THE ALTDEV THAT THIS IS ALL ABOUT OCCURRED ON THE SECOND DAY OF A 2-DAY TRIP AFTER A REDUCED REST OVERNIGHT. WE ARRIVED ON TIME BACK IN OUR HUB CITY; BUT WE WERE ONLY SCHEDULED FOR A 40 MIN TURN- AROUND BEFORE OUR NEXT TRIP. I WANTED TO GRAB A QUICK BREAKFAST SNACK AND I NEEDED TO PREFLT OUR NEW AIRPLANE AS WE WERE GIVEN AN ACFT SWAP. MAINT HAD ALREADY FOUND THAT A LNDG LIGHT WAS BURNED OUT ON THE NEW AIRPLANE AND THEY WERE IN THE PROCESS OF DEFERRING IT. I COPIED DOWN THE ATIS AND CALLED ON THE RADIO TO GET OUR CLRNC. THE RAMP AGENTS WERE ANXIOUS TO BOARD THE AIRPLANE. THE CAPT HAD JUST RECEIVED OUR MAINT LOG BACK FROM MAINT AND WAS CHKING IT OVER WHEN I COPIED DOWN THE CLRNC. 99 PERCENT OF THE TIME WHEN WE DEPART MSP WE ARE GIVEN AN INITIAL ALT OF 5000 FT. BUT; THIS TIME; WE WERE GIVEN 3000 FT EXPECT 4000 FT IN 10 MINS. I READ THIS BACK AND THEN PUT THE SQUAWK CODE IN THE XPONDER. IT WAS AT THIS TIME; AS THE PEOPLE WERE BOARDING; THAT THE CAPT REQUESTED THE ACCEPTANCE CHKLIST. I STOPPED WHAT I WAS DOING AND WENT TO THE CHKLIST; THUS NEVER PUTTING IN THE 3000 FT IN OUR ALT ALERTER. WE STARTED UP NORMALLY AND TAXIED OUT OF THE GATE 10 MINS LATE. AFTER TKOF; TWR SWITCHED US TO DEP CTL AND I CHKED ON AS 'OUT OF 2200 FT FOR 5000 FT' TO WHICH HE RESPONDED; 'RADAR CONTACT.' AT 4800 FT; DEP CAME BACK AND ASKED US TO 'VERIFY CLBING TO 5000 FT;' AND I RESPONDED WITH AN AFFIRMATIVE '5000 FT.' IT WAS THEN THAT I LOOKED DOWN AT MY CLRNC WRITTEN IN FRONT OF ME AND SAW THE 3000 FT EXPECT 4000 FT. I TOLD MY CAPT THAT I HAD BEEN WRONG AND THAT WE WERE SUPPOSED TO BE AT 3000 FT. AT THIS POINT; MY CAPT ASKED ME 'WHAT SHOULD WE DO NOW?' WE DIDN'T DO ANYTHING. AS FAR AS WHAT CAN BE DONE TO PREVENT A RECURRENCE; I BELIEVE THAT I SHOULD ALWAYS TAKE MY TIME AND NOT SACRIFICE THOROUGHNESS IN AN ATTEMPT TO DEPART ON TIME. ALSO; I SHOULD COMPLETE A TASK THAT I HAVE STARTED (IE; PUTTING THE CLRNC INFO INTO THE PROPER INSTS). I SHOULD HAVE REVIEWED THE CLRNC WITH THE CAPT; SINCE HE WAS DISTRACTED BY THE MAINT LOG WHEN I RECEIVED IT. IWAS COMPLACENT IN ACCEPTING 'THE USUAL' WHEN THE CAPT REVIEWED THE FLT INSTS AND AVIONICS; INSTEAD OF DOUBLE- CHKING THE ACTUAL CLRNC. I AM MUCH MORE AWARE OF THE HAZARDS ASSOCIATED WITH COMPLACENCY NOW.