An ACR B737-200 flight crew experienced an autopilot disengagement, leading edge flaps amber in transit light, and altimeter discrepancies during cruise.

Date: 1999-03 · Aircraft: B737-200

Anomalies: Aircraft equipment problem less severeDeviation altitude excursion from assigned altitudeDeviation discrepancy procedural FAROther unspecified

Synopsis

An ACR B737-200 flight crew experienced an autopilot disengagement, leading edge flaps amber in transit light, and altimeter discrepancies during cruise.

Narrative

Rewritten in plain English from NASA’s original all-caps telegraphic report — facts, figures, and terminology preserved.

While at cruise at flight level 350, our aircraft disengaged the autopilot and locked out the autopilot from being re-engaged. I (pilot flying) started hand flying.

We also got a leading edge flaps amber in transit light with a slight roll to the right -- easily countered with aileron/rudder. All gauges for flaps (trailing edge flaps) and leading edge flaps indicated normal; but roll was coming from somewhere. Captain's and co-pilot's altimeters were noticed to be 200-250 feet different. I flew level flight on the captain's altimeter.

ZME queried our altitude which they reported flight level 353; which was the first officer's altimeter setting. After a couple more checks with control; we decided to fly off the first officer's side. Uneventful rest of the flight. We feel that an electrical hiccup caused the malfunction somehow. Our performance data computer has repeat write-ups in the book. Related? Leading edge flaps lights disengaging the autopilot? Our maintenance coordinator did not have an answer.

Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following info: The reporter said that the maintenance personnel never told him what caused the leading edge device to deploy or the captain's altimeter to suddenly malfunction. He said that when the flight crew attempted to determine which leading edge device was unlocked the individual device display showed everything was normal. However; the amber leading edge device in transit light remained on and the aircraft still had a roll moment to the right.

Show the original NASA report (verbatim, telegraphic)

WHILE AT CRUISE AT FL350; OUR ACFT DISENGAGED THE AUTOPLT AND LOCKED OUT THE AUTOPLT FROM BEING RE-ENGAGED. I (PF) STARTED HAND FLYING. WE ALSO GOT A LEADING EDGE FLAPS AMBER IN TRANSIT LIGHT WITH A SLIGHT ROLL TO THE R -- EASILY COUNTERED WITH AILERON/RUDDER. ALL GAUGES FOR FLAPS (TEF) AND LEADING EDGE FLAPS INDICATED NORMAL; BUT ROLL WAS COMING FROM SOMEWHERE. CAPT'S AND COPLT'S ALTIMETERS WERE NOTICED TO BE 200-250 FT DIFFERENT. I FLEW LEVEL FLT ON THE CAPT'S ALTIMETER. ZME QUERIED OUR ALT WHICH THEY RPTED FL353; WHICH WAS THE FO'S ALTIMETER SETTING. AFTER A COUPLE MORE CHKS WITH CTR; WE DECIDED TO FLY OFF THE FO'S SIDE. UNEVENTFUL REST OF THE FLT. WE FEEL THAT AN ELECTRICAL HICCUP CAUSED THE MALFUNCTION SOMEHOW. OUR PERFORMANCE DATA COMPUTER HAS REPEAT WRITE- UPS IN THE BOOK. RELATED? LEADING EDGE FLAPS LIGHTS DISENGAGING THE AUTOPLT? OUR MAINT COORD DID NOT HAVE AN ANSWER. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: THE RPTR SAID THAT THE MAINT PERSONNEL NEVER TOLD HIM WHAT CAUSED THE LEADING EDGE DEVICE TO DEPLOY OR THE CAPT'S ALTIMETER TO SUDDENLY MALFUNCTION. HE SAID THAT WHEN THE FLC ATTEMPTED TO DETERMINE WHICH LEADING EDGE DEVICE WAS UNLOCKED THE INDIVIDUAL DEVICE DISPLAY SHOWED EVERYTHING WAS NORMAL. HOWEVER; THE AMBER LEADING EDGE DEVICE IN TRANSIT LIGHT REMAINED ON AND THE ACFT STILL HAD A ROLL MOMENT TO THE R.

More incidents for this aircraft family →

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.