B747 LNDG VHHH EXPERIENCED COM NAV PROB AND IS ISSUED GAR.

2004-01 · NASA ASRS report 605549

Date: 2004-01 · Aircraft: B747-400

Anomalies: deviation-track-heading-all-types|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-clearance

Synopsis

B747 LNDG VHHH EXPERIENCED COM NAV PROB AND IS ISSUED GAR.

Narrative

THE FLT WAS BEING RADAR VECTORED TO THE ILS RWY 7L FROM THE S. A HDG TO BASE LEG WAS GIVEN WITH A DSCNT CLRNC TO 1500 FT. THE QUALITY OF THE XMISSION WAS POOR (SCRATCHY AND GARBLED) COUPLED WITH AN ACCENT. THE ALT WAS NOT CLRLY UNDERSTOOD BY ALL IN THE COCKPIT SO A REQUEST FOR CONFIRMATION WAS MADE. THE ATC RESPONSE WAS STILL GARBLED AND SCRATCHY BUT THE ALT ASSIGNMENT WAS CONFIRMED ALONG WITH A TURN TO 045 DEGS AND SOMETHING REFING RWY 7L. A TURN TO THE ASSIGNED HDG WAS INITIATED. AS WE APCHED THE LOC; I ASKED ATC IF THIS HDG WAS INTENDED TO INTERCEPT THE LOC. THE XMISSION WAS NOW CLR WITH 'AFFIRMATIVE.' THE PF (IOE) IMMEDIATELY ARMED THE LOC WHICH ENGAGED AND BEGAN A TURN TO CORRECT FOR THE OVERSHOOT. THE AUTOPLT CONTINUED TO OVERCORRECT FLYING THROUGH THE LOC COURSE IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION. AS WE WERE CONCERNED ABOUT THE HIGH TERRAIN TO THE R OF THE LOC; THE PF DISCONNECTED THE AUTOPLT AND MANUALLY FLEW THE ACFT TO A PARALLEL COURSE TO THE LOC. DURING THIS TIME; THE ATC CTLR INITIATED SEVERAL DISTRACTING XMISSIONS REGARDING TUNING THE LOC; RECEIVING THE LOC; AND QUESTIONED IF WE WERE ESTABLISHED ON THE LOC. THE RWY WAS IN SIGHT AT THIS TIME AND I EXPLAINED THAT WE WERE CORRECTING BACK TO THE LOC. THE ATC CTLR THEN ASSIGNED A HDG OF 070 DEGS AND AN ALT OF 6000 FT. SINCE THE RWY WAS IN SIGHT AT THIS TIME IT WAS NOT CLR THAT THE CTLR WAS DIRECTING US TO MAKE A GAR. I CONFIRMED THE CLRNC AND A GAR WAS INITIATED. A RADAR VECTOR TO FINAL AND THE SUBSEQUENT LNDG WAS UNEVENTFUL. IT WAS INTERESTING TO NOTE THE SECOND TIME ON BASE; IN THE SAME LOCATION AS THE FIRST APCH; THE AUDIO QUALITY OF THE ATC XMISSION WAS AGAIN POOR AND GARBLED. WITH A HEIGHTENED AWARENESS OF ALL CREW MEMBERS AND ANTICIPATING ATC INSTRUCTIONS; WE CONFIRMED THAT WE WERE CLRED FOR THE APCH. A PHONE CALL WAS REQUESTED AND INITIATED TO THE APCH CTL SUPVR (WHO WAS THE ACTUAL CTLR) AND THE SEQUENCE OF EVENTS WAS DISCUSSED. IN THAT DISCUSSION; THE CTLR CONFIRMED THAT SEVERAL OTHER FLT CREWS HAVE RPTED THAT THE AUDIO QUALITY OF ATC XMISSION ON BASE LEG WAS DETERMINED TO BE OF POOR QUALITY. THE RESULTING CONFUSION OF ATC CLRNC AND THE RAPID SUCCESSION OF CONFIRMATION; REQUESTS FOR INFO; AND MULTIPLE CLRNCS; INCREASED THE COCKPIT WORKLOAD AND REDUCED THE OPPORTUNITY FOR ME TO HELP THE IOE PF TO ANTICIPATE THE FLT MANEUVER DURING A CRITICAL PHASE OF FLT. THE IOE CREW MEMBER AND I HAVE DEBRIEFED THE SEQUENCE OF EVENTS THAT LED TO THIS EVENT AT GREAT LENGTH.

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.

Loading the flight search…

Frequently asked questions

How do I search flights by aircraft type on FlightFinder?

Pick an aircraft model — Boeing 737, Airbus A320, A380, Boeing 787 Dreamliner and more — enter your origin airport, and FlightFinder shows every route that plane flies from there with live fares.

Which aircraft types can I filter by?

We support Boeing 737/747/757/767/777/787, the full Airbus A220/A319/A320/A321/A330/A340/A350/A380 family, Embraer E170/E175/E190/E195, Bombardier CRJ and Dash 8, and the ATR 42/72 turboprops.

Is FlightFinder free to use?

Search and schedules are free. Pro ($4.99/month, $39/year, or $99 one-time lifetime) unlocks the enriched flight card — on-time stats, CO₂ per passenger, amenities, live gate & weather — plus My Trips with push alerts.

Where does the route data come from?

Live schedules come from Amadeus, AeroDataBox and Travelpayouts. Observed routes (which aircraft actually flew a given city pair) are crowdsourced from adsb.lol ADS-B data under the Open Database License.