ON LNDG FLARE AT MDD; LJ25 FLT CREW OBSERVE AN 'X' ON THE L SIDE OF RWY APCH END. FBO PERSONNEL ADVISE THEY HAD LANDED ON A CLOSED RWY.

Narrative

WHILE FLYING INTO MIDLAND DOWNTOWN AIRPARK; I MADE SEVERAL CALLS TO AN FBO FOR ARPT ADVISORIES WITH NO RESPONSE. I STATED OUR POS OF APPROX 20 MI NW OF THE ARPT WITH OUR INTENTIONS TO LAND ON RWY 7. THE COPLT MADE ALL THE APPROPRIATE CALLS WHILE I MANEUVERED THE AIRPLANE FOR A VISUAL APCH TO THE RWY. DURING THE CRITICAL PHASE OF LNDG; BOTH THE COPLT AND I SAW WHAT LOOKED TO BE AN 'X' IN THE DIRT JUST BEFORE THE RWY. THE 'X' WAS NOT VISIBLE UNTIL THE LAST MOMENT JUST BEFORE TOUCHDOWN. ONCE AT THE FBO; 3 EMPLOYEES MET US AND MOCKED US FOR LNDG ON A CLOSED RWY. WE WERE ALSO TOLD THAT WE WERE NOT THE FIRST TO LAND ON THE RWY THAT DAY. WHEN I ASKED AN EMPLOYEE WHY THE 'X' WAS NOT PLACED DIRECTLY ON THE RWY; HE REPLIED THAT THE RWY WAS SCHEDULED TO BE REPAINTED SOMETIME IN THE NEAR FUTURE. THE EMPLOYEES SEEMED AMUSED AT THE OCCURRENCE; AND IT STRUCK ME AS ODD THAT THEY ALL HAD BEEN OUTSIDE TO OBSERVE THE LNDG; BUT WERE UNAVAILABLE TO ANSWER OUR REQUEST FOR ARPT ADVISORIES. THEY STATED THAT THEY HAD BEEN INSIDE A HANGAR; WAXING AN AIRPLANE; WHICH WAS NOT TRUE. OUR DISPATCH OFFICE HAD SPOKEN WITH THEM 15 MINS EARLIER TO INFORM THEM OF OUR ARR. HAD AN 'X' BEEN APPROPRIATELY MARKED DIRECTLY ON THE RWY; I WOULD HAVE BEEN ABLE TO DISCERN THAT THE RWY WAS CLOSED. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: RPTR ADVISED THAT THE RWY WAS CLOSED FOR NUMBER AND STRIP PAINTING. RPTR STATED THAT ARPT PERSONNEL CLAIMED OTHER ACFT HAD LANDED ON THE CLOSED RWY EARLIER THAT DAY. WHEN QUESTIONED BY THE RPTR ABOUT THE 'X' PLACEMENT BEING LEFT OFF THE RWY APCH END; HE WAS TOLD THAT THEY WERE TOLD TO PLACE IT IN THAT POS. TO THE RPTR'S KNOWLEDGE; NO NOTAM WAS EVER SENT ADVISING OF THE PROPOSED ACTIVITY. THE RPTR ADVISED THAT THE RWY WAS OPENED 'A FEW DAYS LATER.'