PILOT REPORTS DEPARTING DFW ON KING6 DEPARTURE AND USING WRONG FREQUENCY OBTAINED FROM KING6 DAL DEPARTURE.

Narrative

AFTER OBTAINING ATIS I CALLED FOR MY IFR CLEARANCE WHICH READ; 'CLEARED TO THE ZZZ AIRPORT VIA THE KINGDOM 6 DEPARTURE; MILLSAP TRANSITION; V66 ABILENE; DIRECT. 2000 FT EXPECT 6000 FT IN 10 MIN SQUAWK XXXX.' I READ BACK THE CLEARANCE AND WAS CONFIRMED 'READBACK CORRECT' TAXIED OUT AND TOOK OFF ON DFW'S RUNWAY 18R. AFTER DEPARTURE THE CONTROLLER TOLD ME; 'WHEN SPEED AND ALTITUDE PERMIT START YOUR TURN OUT AND CONTACT DEPARTURE.' I BEGAN MY TURN AND MADE MY FIRST RADIO CALL TO REGIONAL APPROACH. THERE WAS NO RESPONSE TO MY 'CALL SIGN.' I ATTEMPTED TO CHECK IN AGAIN IN SHORT SUCCESSION BUT AGAIN WITH NO RESPONSE. THE THIRD TIME I CHECKED IN AND ASKED IF THE CONTROLLER WAS GOING TO ASSIGN ME A HIGHER ALTITUDE; STILL NO RESPONSE WAS GIVEN. ON THE FOURTH CALL TO CHECK IN I ASKED FOR A HIGHER ALTITUDE. THE RESPONSE WAS THAT I WAS ON THE WRONG FREQUENCY AND; AFTER A MOMENTARY PAUSE; WAS TOLD TO EXPEDITE MY FREQUENCY CHANGE. ONCE I SWITCHED FREQUENCIES THE CONTROLLER GAVE ME AN EXPEDITED CLIMB TO 3000 FT AND THEN A CLIMB TO 6000 FT. (MY FLIGHT PLANNED ALTITUDE.) AFTER REACHING 6000 FT THE CONTROLLER ASKED WHAT FREQUENCY I WAS GIVEN FOR DEPARTURE BY CLEARANCE DELIVERY. I TOLD THE CONTROLLER THAT NO FREQUENCY WAS ASSIGNED IN MY IFR CLEARANCE BECAUSE THE SID HAD THE FREQUENCY ALREADY INCLUDED ON IT IN THE TOP LEFT CORNER. I WAS GIVEN A PHONE NUMBER AND A FAX NUMBER TO CALL AND TO FAX THE KINGDOM 6 SID PAGE TO UPON LANDING. AFTER RECHECKING THE SID I REALIZED WHY I WAS ON THE WRONG FREQUENCY. THIS PARTICULAR SID (KINGDOM 6 DEPARTURE) HAS 3 SEPARATE DESCRIPTIONS ON 3 SEPARATE SID PAGES FOR THE SAME SID OUT OF DAL; DFW; AND ONE THAT SERVES THE OTHER AIRPORTS UNDER DFW'S CLASS B. UPON LANDING I CALLED AND TALKED TO THE TRACON MANAGER AND TOLD HIM THAT I HAD; IN ERROR; READ THE DAL DALLAS LOVE KINGDOM 6 DEPARTURE SID PAGE INSTEAD OF THE DFW DALLAS FT WORTH INTL KINGDOM 6 DEPARTURE SID PAGE. I WAS TOLD I WOULD BE CONTACTED WITH A DECISION ON HOW THIS WOULD BE HANDLED. AS STATED EARLIER THERE ARE 3 SEPARATE PAGES; WITH VERY FEW NOTICEABLE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THEM; FOR 3 SEPARATE AREAS; ALL IN CLOSE PROXIMITY; AND ALL FOR THE SAME KINGDOM 6 DEPARTURE. THIS LENDS ITSELF TO POTENTIAL CONFUSION AND POSSIBLE MISREADING OF THE SID AND THUS COMPLICATING SOMETHING THAT WAS MEANT TO STANDARDIZE THESE PROCEDURES. I FEEL THAT HAVING A STANDARD INSTRUMENT DEPARTURE SERVING 15 AIRPORTS IS FINE BUT MORE EFFORT TO HIGHLIGHT THE DIFFERENCES COULD BE ADDRESSED. FOR EXAMPLE THE KINGDOM 6 DEPARTURE FROM DFW IS THE KINGDOM 6 DEPARTURE. THE KINGDOM 6 DEPARTURE FROM DAL COULD EASILY BECOME THE KINGDOM 6.1 DEPARTURE NOW SHOWING A DISTINCT DIFFERENCE TO A SIMILAR SID. WHEN ASSIGNED THEY WOULD BE ASSIGNED AS SAY 'KINGDOM 6.2 DEPARTURE' DEPARTING THE 'AREA DEPARTURE' THAT SERVES AIRPORTS LIKE ADS AND THE 'KINGDOM 6 DEPARTURE' WHEN DEPARTING DFW ONLY.CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: THE REPORTER STATED THAT HE IS NEW TO THE ACFT AND THE AREA; AND THAT HE HAD NEVER ENCOUNTERED A SID THAT SERVED MULTIPLE ARPTS WITH SLIGHT CHANGES. HE BELIEVES THAT NUMBERING THE DEPARTURES SO AS TO ALERT PILOTS THAT THE PROCEDURE SERVES MULTIPLE ARPTS WOULD BENEFIT THE AVIATION COMMUNITY.