A B757 Captain noted an unsatisfactory brake pin on a walkaround which resulted in a lengthy delay while the brake was replaced. The worn condition had been noted 26 flight cycles earlier but deferred based on a company authorized monitoring program requiring only that its condition be rechecked after 30 flight cycles.

2009-10 · NASA ASRS report 855493

Date: 2009-10 · Aircraft: B757-200 · Phase: ground

Anomalies: aircraft-equipment-problem-critical

Synopsis

A B757 Captain noted an unsatisfactory brake pin on a walkaround which resulted in a lengthy delay while the brake was replaced. The worn condition had been noted 26 flight cycles earlier but deferred based on a company authorized monitoring program requiring only that its condition be rechecked after 30 flight cycles.

Narrative

During the preflight exterior inspection I noted the aft brake pin for the #3 forward tire was nearly flush. I advised maintenance and entered the discrepancy in ACARS. Maintenance did a good job of promptly responding and replaced the brake assembly. The required maintenance resulted in a 53-minute departure delay. I subsequently determined from Maintenance Control that the brake at issue had been inspected by Station Maintenance seven days earlier and was on 'recheck interval' status of the recently implemented 'Brake Wear Monitoring' system; which allows 30 flight cycles before further inspection. This aircraft had completed 26 of those 30 cycles when the brake had to be replaced. Clearly the new maintenance procedure fails to ensure that our aircraft are dispatched with serviceable brakes. This is the second event of unserviceable brakes I have encountered since the new procedure was implemented a few months ago. The other instance required the replacement of 3 brake assemblies prior to the scheduled inspection. Under this new maintenance procedure; pilots are effectively the only line of defense against our company aircraft flying with worn-out brakes. While I appreciate that the new brake monitoring system is intended to save costs; clearly it does not work. Further; the recent change to the normal operating section of the pilot's Flight Manual that requires an inspection of the brake wear pins did not prevent this entirely avoidable departure delay. This event undermines passenger confidence that our aircraft are airworthy at scheduled departure time. It also demonstrates that margins of safety are reduced when our maintenance procedures cut so fine a line in an effort to save costs.

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.

Loading the flight search…

Frequently asked questions

How do I search flights by aircraft type on FlightFinder?

Pick an aircraft model — Boeing 737, Airbus A320, A380, Boeing 787 Dreamliner and more — enter your origin airport, and FlightFinder shows every route that plane flies from there with live fares.

Which aircraft types can I filter by?

We support Boeing 737/747/757/767/777/787, the full Airbus A220/A319/A320/A321/A330/A340/A350/A380 family, Embraer E170/E175/E190/E195, Bombardier CRJ and Dash 8, and the ATR 42/72 turboprops.

Is FlightFinder free to use?

Search and schedules are free. Pro ($4.99/month, $39/year, or $99 one-time lifetime) unlocks the enriched flight card — on-time stats, CO₂ per passenger, amenities, live gate & weather — plus My Trips with push alerts.

Where does the route data come from?

Live schedules come from Amadeus, AeroDataBox and Travelpayouts. Observed routes (which aircraft actually flew a given city pair) are crowdsourced from adsb.lol ADS-B data under the Open Database License.