2009-11 · NASA ASRS report 859862
ZSE Controller described airspace incursion event when they; distracted with military aircraft operations; failed to make a timely hand off; noting enhanced automated procedures may have prevented the incident.
I was working sectors 7 and 11 combined; which is normal at that time of day due to lower traffic volumes. Air Carrier X was northbound toward Edmonton Center on J537. Due to lack of automation between ZSE and Edmonton; coordination was accomplished per LOA's regarding Air Carrier X's estimated boundary crossing time at ONEAL. As Air Carrier X continued northbound through my airspace I accepted hand-offs on two Military aircraft who were requesting to join up for aerial refueling. The intended join up point is approximately 100-150 miles southwest of ONEAL. As is often the case; the timing of the join was not perfect; and as a result the two aircraft had several requests to accommodate. I became focused on the two military aircraft and their join up; and lost track of Air Carrier X's position. Having gotten the military aircraft joined and cleared down track; I returned to my scan and noticed Air Carrier X approximately 5 miles north of the border; at nearly the same time; Edmonton center called to inquire about the hand off. There was no loss of separation and the Edmonton controller was not especially bothered or upset with the situation. Due to the prior coordination; he had been expecting Air Carrier X and; as is normal; it seemed as though he had had RADAR on him well prior to the boundary. Overall the situation was harmless; and the aircraft involved were not aware of any incident. Regardless; it was a stark reminder to not get too focused on one particular area or aircraft; especially during lower traffic volumes. Recommendation; continued development of automation between US and Canadian centers would be beneficial; especially the development of an automated hand off. Such automation would have probably prevented this incident; however; it was really my alternate focus that was the leading factor.
More incidents for this aircraft family
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.
Loading the flight search…
Pick an aircraft model — Boeing 737, Airbus A320, A380, Boeing 787 Dreamliner and more — enter your origin airport, and FlightFinder shows every route that plane flies from there with live fares.
We support Boeing 737/747/757/767/777/787, the full Airbus A220/A319/A320/A321/A330/A340/A350/A380 family, Embraer E170/E175/E190/E195, Bombardier CRJ and Dash 8, and the ATR 42/72 turboprops.
Search and schedules are free. Pro ($4.99/month, $39/year, or $99 one-time lifetime) unlocks the enriched flight card — on-time stats, CO₂ per passenger, amenities, live gate & weather — plus My Trips with push alerts.
Live schedules come from Amadeus, AeroDataBox and Travelpayouts. Observed routes (which aircraft actually flew a given city pair) are crowdsourced from adsb.lol ADS-B data under the Open Database License.