Air carrier on descent into PHX initiates a go around because of both an ATC and aircraft altitude alert during a non precision approach.

2010-02 · NASA ASRS report 876006

Date: 2010-02 · Aircraft: B737-700 · Phase: approach

Anomalies: deviation-discrepancy-procedural-other-unknown|inflight-event-encounter-cftt-cfit

Synopsis

Air carrier on descent into PHX initiates a go around because of both an ATC and aircraft altitude alert during a non precision approach.

Narrative

We received the ATIS as per the FOM while enroute for landing at PHX. ATIS called the weather at 1700 SCT; 2500 BKN with 10 miles visibility. As we approached the airport; we were vectored for the ILS 26 GS out. As we descended to FAF altitude; we noticed that the weather was not as advertised on the ATIS so we quickly briefed the approach. Everything was completed prior to the FAF and the aircraft was stabilized and ready to descend to the MDA. As we passed the FAF; the pilot flying scrolled a vertical speed of 1200 fpm. As we approached 2500 feet on the altimeter; Tower advised us to check altitude - they had an Altitude Alert on us. About 2 seconds later we get an Altitude Caution; followed by Terrain Caution Alert. Since we did not have the airport in sight; we went around. I am not sure why this happened. We were established on the localizer; our altitude was well above the step-down fix as well as the MDA; our altimeter was correct; and our vertical speed was acceptable since we were well above 1000 ft AGL. I believe that ATC should have updated the weather sooner. Our ATIS was the one being used even after our go-around. ATIS Mike was 1 hour old when we were on approach. The weather was not 1700 SCT with 10 miles. If this weather was updated to current conditions; we would have switched roles to have the Captain flying since the actual weather was very close to the allowable limit that the First Officer can fly a non-precision approach per our FOM. But that clearly to me is NOT the reason we got the alerts. We got the alert for some other reason than Pilot performance.

Second reporter narrative

We are unsure of why we received the warnings on the Runway 26 approach and can only assume the system predicted a threat based on a 1500 fpm descent rate and the Tower's on final approach.

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.

Loading the flight search…

Frequently asked questions

How do I search flights by aircraft type on FlightFinder?

Pick an aircraft model — Boeing 737, Airbus A320, A380, Boeing 787 Dreamliner and more — enter your origin airport, and FlightFinder shows every route that plane flies from there with live fares.

Which aircraft types can I filter by?

We support Boeing 737/747/757/767/777/787, the full Airbus A220/A319/A320/A321/A330/A340/A350/A380 family, Embraer E170/E175/E190/E195, Bombardier CRJ and Dash 8, and the ATR 42/72 turboprops.

Is FlightFinder free to use?

Search and schedules are free. Pro ($4.99/month, $39/year, or $99 one-time lifetime) unlocks the enriched flight card — on-time stats, CO₂ per passenger, amenities, live gate & weather — plus My Trips with push alerts.

Where does the route data come from?

Live schedules come from Amadeus, AeroDataBox and Travelpayouts. Observed routes (which aircraft actually flew a given city pair) are crowdsourced from adsb.lol ADS-B data under the Open Database License.