FAILED TO MAKE NOTE IN LOGBOOK OF MAINTENANCE RELEASE FOR FLT WITH INOPERATIVE AWI SYSTEM.

1988-06 · NASA ASRS report 89226

Date: 1988-06 · Aircraft: Small Transport; Low Wing; 2 Turboprop Eng

Anomalies: deviation-discrepancy-procedural-far|other-unspecified

Synopsis

FAILED TO MAKE NOTE IN LOGBOOK OF MAINTENANCE RELEASE FOR FLT WITH INOPERATIVE AWI SYSTEM.

Narrative

DUE TO OUR GROSS WT 13595# AND HIGH TEMP; WE HAD TO USE A WET PWR SETTING OF 91%. NO DRY PWR SETTING WAS AVAILABLE. AS F/O; APPLIED TKOF PWR; TURNED ON THE AWI SWITCH AT 40% TORQUE WITH NO INDICATION OF A RISE IN TORQUE. AT 20 KTS WE ABORTED THE TKOF ROLL. THE AWI HAD WORKED PREVIOUSLY; SO I WAS NOT SURE IF IT WAS SOMETHING WE HAD OVERLOOKED OR IF THE AWI SWITCH HAD MADE GOOD CONTACT AND/OR IF THE SPD LEVERS HAD SENT THE SIGNAL TO THE SRL COMPUTER. THE SPD LEVERS WERE A LITTLE LOOSE. WITH THESE UNCERTAINTIES I CALLED FOR ANOTHER TKOF. ON THE SECOND TKOF ATTEMPT I MANUALLY HELD THE SPD LEVERS IN PLACE; BUT STILL NO INDICATION OF A TORQUE RISE IN EITHER ENG WHEN I TURNED ON THE AWI SWITCH. AGAIN WE ABORTED; THEN RETURNED TO THE GATE. WE OFF LOADED PAX AND I CALLED MAINT CONTROL. DURING THIS TIME THE PIH AGENTS GOT 3 PAX TO TAKE ANOTHER FLT. THIS PUT OUR WT DOWN TO 13000 LBS (INCLUDING 100 LBS FUEL BURN). AT THIS WT WE COULD MAKE A DRY TKOF USING 68%. MAINT TOLD ME THEY COULD NOT DO ANYTHING IN PHI; SO I TOLD THEM WE COULD MAKE A DRY TKOF AND THEN WRITE UP THE AIRPLANE AT BOI; OUR DEST. MAINT AND I AGREED TO THIS COURSE OF ACTION AND WE LEFT PIH WITH 3 LESS PAX USING 68% DRY. WHEN WE GOT TO BOI; I WROTE UP THE AIRPLANE. AFTER HAVING A COUPLE OF DAYS TO REFLECT AND SOME RECURRENT TRNING; I CLEARLY SEE WHERE THE MISTAKES WERE MADE. #1--ONE TKOF ABORT WOULD HAVE BEEN SUFFICIENT. #2--I MISUNDERSTOOD FAR 135.179; I SHOULD HAVE GOTTEN MAINT TO RSI THE AIRPLANE PER THE MEL OVER THE PHONE WHILE I MADE THE APPROPRIATE ENTRIES IN THE MAINT LOG. WX FOR MOST OF THE DAY HAD BEEN HOT--LOW HUNDREDS--AND THIS FLT WAS OUR LAST OF AN 8 LEG DAY. I FEEL THAT ALTHOUGH THERE WAS SOME CONFUSION AS TO INTERPRETATION OF LEGALITIES; AT NO TIME DURING THIS FLT WAS SAFETY COMPROMISED. IF THE FAA SHOULD DECIDE TO PRESS THIS CASE; IT WOULD DO SO OVER A MATTER OF COMPLIANCE RATHER THAN SAFETY. I HAVE RECOMMENDED TO TRNING DEPT THAT; ALTHOUGH I BELIEVE OURS TO BE ONE OF THE BEST TRNING FACS; WE SPEND MORE TIME DURING RECURRENT GND SCHOOLS IN THE FLT OPS MANUAL AND THE FAR'S.

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.

Loading the flight search…

Frequently asked questions

How do I search flights by aircraft type on FlightFinder?

Pick an aircraft model — Boeing 737, Airbus A320, A380, Boeing 787 Dreamliner and more — enter your origin airport, and FlightFinder shows every route that plane flies from there with live fares.

Which aircraft types can I filter by?

We support Boeing 737/747/757/767/777/787, the full Airbus A220/A319/A320/A321/A330/A340/A350/A380 family, Embraer E170/E175/E190/E195, Bombardier CRJ and Dash 8, and the ATR 42/72 turboprops.

Is FlightFinder free to use?

Search and schedules are free. Pro ($4.99/month, $39/year, or $99 one-time lifetime) unlocks the enriched flight card — on-time stats, CO₂ per passenger, amenities, live gate & weather — plus My Trips with push alerts.

Where does the route data come from?

Live schedules come from Amadeus, AeroDataBox and Travelpayouts. Observed routes (which aircraft actually flew a given city pair) are crowdsourced from adsb.lol ADS-B data under the Open Database License.