2010-08 · NASA ASRS report 907263
An Aerostar pilot reported descending below the segment altitude between the IAF and FAF while flying practice RNAV and ILS approaches. Personal distractions and avionics issues were factors.
[I] went to a nearby airport to practice approaches. I misevaluated or misread where I was on two approaches. I had thought [I] was inside the FAF and cleared to a lower altitude but I was actually between the IAF and FAF. ON RNAV 34; I didn't focus on the 1;700 FT limit to the FAF and descended below that arriving at 800 FT. I conveyed my belief to Tower they told me the altitude was 1;700 minimum. I climbed up. I'm familiar with the area and I was VMC towards the end of the descent. After climb out; I shot the ILS 12 and I descended below the minimums on that as well; but never entered IMC conditions. Terminated that approach; was given 2;000 FT; and climbed up to 2;300. I also told the Controller I was VMC; which technically was irrelevant since I was on an IFR flight plan. He probably thought I didn't know what I was doing; even though I've been to the airport flying these same approaches 10 to 20 times a year for the past 16 years. After that; I decided I didn't have the focus to continue; so I flew back to my home base. Had some avionics problems; one com radio was intermittent and I've been having some problems with the autopilot for months. Because of the autopilot problems I've shot dozens of approaches in the past few months (many in VMC; but at least 10 in IMC and some with an instructor helping with evaluating the autopilot problems); so I don't think it's lack of currency. The only thing I can think of is to focus more on the approach plates. I was distracted from some work and personal issues; coupled with some avionics issues. I've been experimenting with electronic charts. I'm going to go back to paper charts which are easier to read and study.
The Reporter stated that he has his aircraft equipped with a hard wired EFB with GPS; traffic avoidance equipment; real time weather viewing and additionally carries a 14' laptop computer and attached GPS with flight planning and guidance software. In this case he admitted information overload and because the built in EFB presentation is only 7' he missed the altitude restriction between the IAF and the FAF. The screen is simply too small and zooming in removes situational awareness while zooming out removes too much detail. The aircraft system as equipped is not working for him and is searching for alternative presentation methods possibly on a new 9.5' screen device.
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.
Loading the flight search…
Pick an aircraft model — Boeing 737, Airbus A320, A380, Boeing 787 Dreamliner and more — enter your origin airport, and FlightFinder shows every route that plane flies from there with live fares.
We support Boeing 737/747/757/767/777/787, the full Airbus A220/A319/A320/A321/A330/A340/A350/A380 family, Embraer E170/E175/E190/E195, Bombardier CRJ and Dash 8, and the ATR 42/72 turboprops.
Search and schedules are free. Pro ($4.99/month, $39/year, or $99 one-time lifetime) unlocks the enriched flight card — on-time stats, CO₂ per passenger, amenities, live gate & weather — plus My Trips with push alerts.
Live schedules come from Amadeus, AeroDataBox and Travelpayouts. Observed routes (which aircraft actually flew a given city pair) are crowdsourced from adsb.lol ADS-B data under the Open Database License.