Casualties unknown

2015-08-28: Viking DHC-6-400 (JA201D) — First Flying Co., Ltd. — At Aguni Airport, JP

At Aguni Airport, JP

On August 28, 2015, a Viking DHC-6-400 (registration JA201D) operated by First Flying Co., Ltd. was involved in an aviation accident near At Aguni Airport, JP. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: It is highly probable that this accident occurred because, when the aircraft landed, the First Officer, as the PF in charge of flying, could not properly control the aircraft as it started to deflect after touchdown, as a result of which the aircraft departed… This summary draws on records from the Japan Transport Safety Board (JTSB); 2 related events involving the same aircraft type or operator are linked below.

Sourcesthe Japan Transport Safety Board (JTSB)Primary reportUpdated 1785096185Data APIEditorial standards

On August 28, 2015, a Viking DHC-6-400 (JA201D) operated by First Flying Co., Ltd. departed the runway during landing at Aguni Airport, colliding with a fence and lateral groove. The aircraft sustained substantial damage; a crewmember and ten passengers suffered minor injuries.

Flight History

On August 28, 2015, at approximately 08:55 JST, a Viking DHC-6-400 registered JA201D, operated by First Flying Co., Ltd., was conducting a passenger transport flight from Naha Airport to Aguni Airport. The flight was operated under Visual Flight Rules. The cockpit crew consisted of a Pilot in Command (PIC) seated in the right seat as Pilot Monitoring (PM) and instructor, and a First Officer (FO) seated in the left seat as Pilot Flying (PF) and trainee for promotion to PIC. There were 14 persons on board: the PIC, the FO, a crewmember, and 12 passengers (including one company employee).

Accident Sequence

According to the flight data recorder (FDR) and cockpit voice recorder (CVR) records, the aircraft took off from Naha Airport at 08:38. During the approach to Aguni Airport, the PF conducted a landing briefing at 08:46, specifying flap 20° and Vref of 77 kt. The aircraft passed the threshold of Runway 19 at 75 kt at 08:54:27. At 08:54:31, wheel touchdown sounds were recorded, followed by tire screeching. The heading was 189°, bank angle 0.5° left, ground speed 76 kt. At 08:54:32, the PIC instructed "Don't brake," repeated at 08:54:36. The heading increased to 195° and ground speed decreased to 62 kt. At 08:54:38, the aircraft began to depart from the right side of the runway. By 08:54:40, it entered the grass area to the right of the runway, with heading 209°, bank angle 0.6° left, and ground speed 49 kt. Collision noise was recorded at 08:54:41.

Damage and Injuries

The aircraft collided with the airport perimeter fence and a lateral groove, resulting in substantial damage. No fire occurred. A crewmember and ten passengers suffered minor injuries.

Investigation Findings

The Japan Transport Safety Board investigated the accident. The PIC stated that the PF had long experience. The PF was responsible for flying, while the PIC monitored and instructed. The investigation noted that the PF forgot to perform the checklist, and the PIC did not properly monitor or point out the omission, leading to a touchdown with the nose wheel deflected to the right. The PF's knowledge of the aircraft system was inadequate, and the company had not properly confirmed the effectiveness of ground school training.

Probable cause

It is highly probable that this accident occurred because, when the aircraft landed, the First Officer, as the PF in charge of flying, could not properly control the aircraft as it started to deflect after touchdown, as a result of which the aircraft departed from the side of the runway and collided with a fence on the airport perimeter. It is probable that the aircraft started to deflect after touchdown because the PF forgot to perform the checklist, while the PIC, as the PM in charge of duties other than flying, did not properly monitor the situation or did not perform the necessary pointed out, as a result of which the aircraft touched down with the nose wheel deflected to the right. It is somewhat likely that the PF could not properly control the aircraft as it started to deflect after touchdown, because his knowledge concerning the aircraft system of the aircraft was inadequate, as a result of which he did not fully understand situations that cause deflection to start. It is somewhat likely, moreover, that the insufficient response by the PIC when an unforeseen situation arose contributed to this. It is probable that the knowledge of the PF was inadequate and he did not fully understand situations that cause deflection to start, because the company had not properly confirmed the effectiveness of ground school training that should be undertaken prior to route training and training related to establishing knowledge.

Investigation report by the Japan Transport Safety Board (JTSB). Original record: https://jtsb.mlit.go.jp/eng-air_report/JA201D.pdf. This page is a structured re-presentation; facts and quotes are in the Japan Transport Safety Board (JTSB) - Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism.