No fatalities

ATSB examines two Robinson R22 drive belt failures leading to hard landings (VH-8H8)

Near Argadarga Aerodrome, NT, and Chillagoe Aerodrome, Qld, Northern Territory

On November 15, 2025, a Robinson Helicopter Co R22 Beta (registration VH-8H8) operated by Georgina Pastoral Company Pty Ltd was involved in an aviation accident near Near Argadarga Aerodrome, NT, and Chillagoe Aerodrome, Qld, Northern Territory. No fatalities were reported. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: For VH-8H8, the forward drive belt likely became incorrectly engaged in the sheaves during startup, leading to its failure and subsequent interference with the rear belt. For VH-HFQ, the forward drive belt failed in-flight for undetermined reasons. This summary draws on records from the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB).

Sourcesthe Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB)Primary reportUpdated 2026-07-19Data APIEditorial standards

The ATSB investigated two occurrences where drive belt failures caused rapid rotor RPM decay in Robinson R22 helicopters, resulting in hard landings with no prior warning.

What happened

Two separate incidents involved Robinson R22 helicopters experiencing sudden drive train failures. In the first event involving VH-8H8, the pilot detected a burning rubber smell followed shortly by a loud bang. This was immediately accompanied by a significant drop in main rotor RPM and a spike in engine RPM. The flight had lasted only 10 to 15 minutes prior to the failure.

In the second occurrence involving VH-HFQ, the pilot also reported a rapid decay in main rotor RPM, consistent with drive belt separation observed on the ground. This flight had been longer, lasting approximately 30 minutes, and no burning rubber smell was reported beforehand. In both cases, the pilots recognized the emergency as an engine or drive system failure and immediately lowered the collective to enter autorotation.

The investigation

The ATSB examined the physical evidence and pilot reports to determine the causal chain. For VH-8H8, uneven belt wear indicated that the forward belt was not correctly seated in the drive sheave grooves. This misalignment likely occurred during startup, leading to abnormal wear and eventual failure of the forward belt. The failed forward belt then interfered with the rear belt, causing it to fracture and resulting in a complete disconnect of the drive train.

For VH-HFQ, the mechanism of failure could not be determined because the belts were unavailable for inspection. The longer flight time and lack of pre-failure odor suggested a different failure mode than the first incident. In both cases, the helicopters had recently been inspected, the belts were relatively new, and pre-flight checks showed no issues. Notably, two pilots assessed the belt tension on VH-8H8 as acceptable, making excessive slack an unlikely cause.

Findings

The investigation highlighted that power loss events can occur with limited prior warning. In both instances, the initial indications of failure coincided almost exactly with the rotor RPM decay, leaving no time for a controlled power-on landing. The pilot of VH-8H8 noted a few seconds' delay in diagnosing the condition before lowering the collective, during which rotor speed dropped to minimum allowable levels, increasing risk at low altitude.

Records from maintainers indicated a recent increase in low-time drive belt replacements across the fleet. Several affected helicopters, including those in these occurrences, used belts from the same lot number. This suggested a possible manufacturing anomaly predisposing certain batches to stretching, although this could not be confirmed. No widespread evidence of a broader manufacturing defect was found.

Safety message

Pilots must remain intimately familiar with emergency procedures and be prepared to act immediately upon any abnormal in-flight indications. Given the potential for sudden power loss with minimal warning, rapid recognition and execution of autorotation are critical to mitigating risk.

Probable cause

For VH-8H8, the forward drive belt likely became incorrectly engaged in the sheaves during startup, leading to its failure and subsequent interference with the rear belt. For VH-HFQ, the forward drive belt failed in-flight for undetermined reasons.