5 fatalities

2014-03-12: Beechcraft 90 King Air (HK-4921) — Ambulancias Aéreas de Colombia — Villavicencio, Colombia

Villavicencio, ColombiaLanding (descent or approach)

On March 12, 2014, a Beechcraft 90 King Air (registration HK-4921) operated by Ambulancias Aéreas de Colombia was involved in an aviation accident near Villavicencio, Colombia during landing or approach. 5 people were killed. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The following factors were identified: - The lack of technical knowledge published in the POH for the execution of the pertinent actions during the failure of the engine in flight, together with the unwise decisions made by the crew in that situation. This summary draws on records from the Bureau of Aircraft Accidents Archives (B3A).

Sourcesthe Bureau of Aircraft Accidents Archives (B3A)Primary reportUpdated 1781193688Data APIEditorial standards

A twin-engine aircraft on an ambulance flight from Bogotá crashed during approach to Villavicencio after reporting problems. All five occupants were killed and the aircraft destroyed by fire.

Accident Overview

On an unspecified date, a twin-engine aircraft departed Bogotá-El Dorado Airport at 0600 LT on an ambulance flight to Araracuara, State of Caquetá. The aircraft carried two doctors, one patient, and two pilots. Fifteen minutes into the flight, the crew contacted ATC, reported problems, and was cleared to divert to Villavicencio.

Crash Details

While on approach to Villavicencio-La Vanguardia Airport, the aircraft stalled and crashed in a wooded area parallel to a road. The impact was followed by a fire that engulfed the aircraft. The aircraft was destroyed by the post-crash fire, and all five occupants were killed.

Probable Cause

The official investigation identified multiple factors contributing to the accident:

  • Lack of technical knowledge published in the Pilot's Operating Handbook (POH) for executing appropriate actions during an engine failure in flight, combined with unwise decisions by the crew.
  • The crew's haste to land led to uncoordinated actions and a lack of assertiveness in executing manufacturer procedures, navigation charts, and published approach procedures.
  • Omissions, reactions, and deviations that were inappropriate for conducting the flight safely to the runway.
  • Turning toward the runway on the same side as the inoperative (critical) engine while applying maximum power on the operational engine during an unstabilized approach, resulting in loss of control at low altitude.