10 fatalities

2013-03-12: Embraer EMB-820 Navajo/Carajá (PT-VAQ) — Fretax Taxi Aéreo — Almeirim, Brazil

Almeirim, BrazilLanding (descent or approach)

On March 12, 2013, an Embraer EMB-820 Navajo/Carajá (registration PT-VAQ) operated by Fretax Taxi Aéreo was involved in an aviation accident near Almeirim, Brazil during landing or approach. 10 people were killed. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The official findings identified that the pilot accepted risks inherent to the flight despite lacking experience, was complacent, and likely felt insecure, negatively affecting performance. This summary draws on records from the Bureau of Aircraft Accidents Archives (B3A).

Sourcesthe Bureau of Aircraft Accidents Archives (B3A)Primary reportUpdated 1781194320Data APIEditorial standards

A twin-engine aircraft crashed 5 km short of the runway at Almeirim during a night approach, killing all 10 occupants. The official investigation cited pilot inexperience, insufficient training, and company operational decisions.

Accident Details

On a night flight, a twin-engine aircraft departed Belém-Val de Cans-Júlio Cezar Ribeiro Airport at 1907 local time, bound for Almeirim. The aircraft carried one pilot and nine employees of a company involved in constructing a hydro-electric station. After an eventful flight at flight level 85, the pilot began descent and contacted ground at 2023 local time. During the final approach in darkness, the aircraft descended too low, struck the ground 5 kilometers short of the runway, and burst into flames. The aircraft was destroyed, and all ten occupants were killed.

Official Investigation Findings

The investigation identified multiple findings. The pilot accepted the flight despite lacking sufficient experience in the aircraft and being the sole crewmember on a night operation. He reportedly called his father before the flight, expressing insecurity about conducting it. The pilot's motivation for career advancement may have influenced his decision to operate the flight despite low confidence. The flight's characteristics—nighttime, remote Amazon jungle region, and the pilot's first solo flight in the aircraft—likely impaired his perception and situational awareness.

The company expedited the pilot's operational progression, potentially depriving him of necessary experience. The company's work organization assigned a pilot not fully adapted to night flights without an artificial horizon and allowed takeoffs with weight exceeding manual limits. Prioritization of financial considerations over operational safety may have led to designating a single, inexperienced pilot for nine passengers.

During landing preparation, the pilot likely allowed speed and power to drop below the minimum required for level flight on the downwind leg. The runway's isolated location in the Amazon, lacking visual references at night, contributed to the pilot's difficulty maintaining flight. Inadequate training left the pilot without essential technical abilities. The company's decision to assign a short-experienced pilot without a copilot for a night flight to a jungle aerodrome increased operational risk; the risk management process was probably inappropriate. It was the pilot's first night flight without a copilot, and his limited experience likely hindered task management and situational awareness.

It was not determined whether the company chose to omit a copilot to transport a ninth passenger, potentially disregarding the aircraft's airworthiness certificate requirements.

Probable cause

The official findings identified that the pilot accepted risks inherent to the flight despite lacking experience, was complacent, and likely felt insecure, negatively affecting performance. Factors included insufficient training, expedited career progression, company operational decisions prioritizing financial considerations over safety, and the pilot's inadequate management of aircraft speed and power during approach. The isolated jungle runway without visual references at night and the designation of a single, inexperienced pilot contributed to the accident. Risk management was inappropriate.