Casualties unknown

Aircraft Damaged After Forced Landing Due to Electrical Failure (N9585G)

Marshfiled, MA, US

On October 29, 1986, a Cessna U206F (registration N9585G) operated by George William Stuart was involved in an aviation accident near Marshfiled, MA. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The alternator belt failure, which caused an in-flight electrical failure, and the pilot's decision to land in dark, foggy conditions with no runway lights, resulting in a hard landing and nose gear collapse. This summary draws on records from the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive.

Sourcesthe U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archivePrimary reportUpdated 2026-06-20Data APIEditorial standards

An aircraft suffered damage after a forced landing in poor visibility following an in-flight electrical failure caused by an alternator belt issue.

What happened

During flight, the aircraft experienced a complete electrical failure attributed to the failure of the alternator belt. Without electrical power, the pilot was unable to deploy the flaps, which significantly compromised the approach and landing capability. The situation was further complicated by adverse weather conditions, including darkness, fog, and a lack of runway lighting.

Attempting to land in these difficult circumstances, the pilot executed a long approach with limited visibility. The aircraft ultimately landed on the grass adjacent to the runway rather than on the paved surface itself. Upon touchdown, the nose wheel collapsed due to the hard impact and off-runway conditions, resulting in damage to the aircraft.

The investigation

The investigation identified the root cause of the electrical system loss as a mechanical failure of the alternator belt. This failure led to the total loss of electrical power in flight, which prevented the operation of critical systems such as the flaps and likely contributed to the inability to maintain proper situational awareness during the final approach due to the loss of electrical lighting.

Findings

Several factors contributed to the severity of the incident. The primary mechanical failure was the alternator belt. Environmental conditions, specifically darkness and fog, severely reduced visibility. The lack of runway lights further hindered the pilot's ability to align with the runway. Additionally, the inability to use flaps due to the electrical failure resulted in a higher approach speed and longer landing distance. The collapse of the nose wheel was a direct result of the hard landing on the grass beside the runway.

Probable cause

The alternator belt failure, which caused an in-flight electrical failure, and the pilot's decision to land in dark, foggy conditions with no runway lights, resulting in a hard landing and nose gear collapse.

Frequently asked questions

What happened in the 29 Oct 1986 Cessna U206F accident near Marshfiled, MA?

An aircraft suffered damage after a forced landing in poor visibility following an in-flight electrical failure caused by an alternator belt issue.

What aircraft was involved and where did it happen?

The accident on 29 Oct 1986 involved a Cessna U206F, registration N9585G, operated by George William Stuart, at Marshfiled, MA.

What was the probable cause of the accident?

The alternator belt failure, which caused an in-flight electrical failure, and the pilot's decision to land in dark, foggy conditions with no runway lights, resulting in a hard landing and nose gear collapse.

Investigation report by the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive. Original record: https://carol.ntsb.gov/event/20001213X35060. This page is a structured re-presentation; facts and quotes are in the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), United States.