Casualties unknown

1992-08-12: Hughes 369D (N58425) — Colorado Helicopters, Inc. — Maxwell, CA

Maxwell, CA, US

On August 12, 1992, a Hughes 369D (registration N58425) operated by Colorado Helicopters, Inc. was involved in an aviation accident near Maxwell, CA. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: THE FAILURE OF THE PILOT TO MAINTAIN AN ADEQUATE VISUAL OUTLOOK, AND FAILURE OF THE COMPANY TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE TRAINING. This summary draws on records from the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive; 1 related events involving the same aircraft type or operator are linked below.

Sourcesthe U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archivePrimary reportUpdated 1781061362Data APIEditorial standards

A helicopter collided with a powerline transmission tower while towing a cable, damaging main rotor blades and tail boom. The pilot, newly hired with no external load experience, was left to work alone after the chief pilot's departure.

Accident Sequence

A helicopter struck a powerline transmission tower while towing a cable attached via a cargo hook. The aircraft was moving laterally toward the tower when its main rotor blades made contact. The impact caused a blade tip weight to separate and penetrate the tail boom in two locations, damaging the tail rotor drive shaft. The helicopter then executed two right spins in a slow descent, remaining tethered by the steel cable. During the second rotation, components of the tail rotor detached.

Post-Impact Observations

Witnesses reported no observation of the cable being jettisoned during the sequence of events. The aircraft descended under the restraint of the cable, which remained connected throughout the spins.

Pilot and Company Information

The pilot had been recently hired and possessed no prior Class C external load experience. Training was provided by the company’s chief pilot, who departed the organization three days after the pilot’s hiring. This departure left the pilot to operate without supervision.

Regulatory Communication

The FAA office holding the operator’s certificate was notified of the chief pilot’s departure. That office did not, nor was it required to, alert the local FAA district office regarding the operator’s external load operations within that district’s geographic area of responsibility.

Investigation report by the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive. Original record: https://carol.ntsb.gov/event/20001211X15431. This page is a structured re-presentation; facts and quotes are in the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), United States.