Casualties unknown

1998-06-09: Cessna T210N (N199JM) — Hillsboro, OR

Hillsboro, OR, US

On June 9, 1998, a Cessna T210N (registration N199JM) was involved in an aviation accident near Hillsboro, OR. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The crankshaft separated in fatigue due to a circumferential gouge mark on the #2 cheek, consistent with connecting rod shifting during engine operation. This summary draws on records from the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive.

Sourcesthe U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archivePrimary reportUpdated 1781061362Data APIEditorial standards

An aircraft experienced a power loss on approach, struck trees, entered a stall/spin, and impacted a power line and ground. Post-crash examination revealed a crankshaft fatigue failure originating from a gouge mark, with connecting rod issues and an incomplete engine overhaul.

Incident Overview

On approach to the runway, the pilot-in-command reported a power loss. The aircraft subsequently passed through the tops of trees approximately 150 feet beyond the point of power loss, entered a stall/spin maneuver, and impacted a power line and the ground roughly 2,800 feet short of the runway threshold. Post-impact examination found the flaps and landing gear in a retracted position.

Engine Examination

Post-crash examination of the engine revealed that the crankshaft had separated in fatigue. The fatigue crack originated from a circumferential gouge mark on the aft face of the #2 cheek, located outboard of the forward radius of the #1 rod journal. This gouge mark was consistent with the connecting rod shifting forward during engine operation. Rub marks on the cheek walls of the #1 connecting rod were consistent with tight piston pin bushing-to-piston pin clearance. Additionally, all connecting rod bushings were found to be undersize.

Maintenance History

Review of the airframe and engine logs showed that a top overhaul of the engine had been performed approximately 23 flight hours prior to the crankshaft failure. During that overhaul, the piston pins were replaced, but the connecting rod bushings were not. No dimensional check of the bushings was made at that time, nor was one required. The engine had been overhauled 515 hours before the top overhaul. The manufacturer's overhaul manual specifies that new bushings should be reamed to the specified inside diameter.

Additional Findings

Post-crash examination also identified non-standard connecting rod cotter keys and light fretting between the engine case halves.

Probable Cause

The probable cause of the incident is the fatigue separation of the crankshaft due to a circumferential gouge mark on the #2 cheek, consistent with shifting of the connecting rod. Contributing factors include undersized connecting rod bushings and the lack of dimensional verification during the top overhaul.

Investigation report by the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive. Original record: https://carol.ntsb.gov/event/20001211X10416. This page is a structured re-presentation; facts and quotes are in the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), United States.